Hi,
The draft is now an RFC.
Perhaps the code should reflect those changes as well ?
Index: sys/netinet6/frag6.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet6/frag6.c,v
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -u -p -r1.47 frag6.c
---
Have you verified that we follow the RFC, and not just -00 of the draft?
On 2013 Aug 21 (Wed) at 23:40:12 -0700 (-0700), Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
:Hi,
:
:The draft is now an RFC.
:Perhaps the code should reflect those changes as well ?
:
:
:Index: sys/netinet6/frag6.c
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
Have you verified that we follow the RFC, and not just -00 of the draft?
The table of OSes were updated and some terms were changed:
A host that receives an IPv6 packet that includes a Fragment
Header with the Fragment
On 21/08/13(Wed) 16:29, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Now that IPv4 addresses stay on the interface list even if something
bad occurs during in_ifinit(), I'd like to make in_control() look for
the previously configured addresses on the interface list rather than
on the global list.
New try, with
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
Have you verified that we follow the RFC, and not just -00 of the draft?
The RFC actually mentions that OpenBSD-current as of 2012 is following the
specification so I think this is OK.
On 2013 Aug 21 (Wed) at 23:40:12 -0700
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
I'm not sure if applies to OpenBSD as well, but NetBSD
also disallowed SIOCSIFDSTADDR for ioctl.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet6/in6.c?annotate=1.166only_with_tag=MAIN
1.2 itojun374:
