On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 15:57, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:30:41 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
I don't see how KR compat helps us. None of the headers in
/usr/include are KR anymore. How would one compile the generated output?
You're assuming that the resulting code will be
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:38:07 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
True, I phrased that poorly. What I'm assuming is that the code will
be built by a compiler that supports the const keyword. Or in other
words, if you're using a 25 year old cross compiler, I don't think
it's unreasonable to expect you to
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:50:53PM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:38:07 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
True, I phrased that poorly. What I'm assuming is that the code will
be built by a compiler that supports the const keyword. Or in other
words, if you're using a 25 year
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:05:23 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
Come on Jim, it's dead.
I'm a doctor, not a programmer! Err, wait...
- todd
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:38:07 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
True, I phrased that poorly. What I'm assuming is that the code will
be built by a compiler that supports the const keyword. Or in other
words, if you're using a 25 year old cross compiler, I don't think
it's unreasonable to expect you to
