The rules for locking base and ports are not the same.
Having the build infrastructure in-ports means it can be fixed at the
same time as ports. Having it in-base means yet another possibility for
synchronization issues between base and ports.
Likewise for putting the man pages inside a package.
Now fd_getfile() function returns unacquired struct file instance and the
typical usage is:
struct file *fp;
if ((fp = fd_getfile(fpd, fd)) == NULL)
return ENOENT;
if (/* obtained fp is unacceptable */)
return EERROR;
FREF(fp);
Hi Alex,
committed, thanks.
Ingo
Index: intro.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man1/intro.1,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 intro.1
--- intro.1 10 Jan 2010 10:53:33 - 1.12
+++ intro.1 21 Apr
Hi,
while reading the intro(1) man page, I found a small inconsistency with
the subsequent man pages:
../man3/intro.3:The manual pages in section 3 provide an overview of the
C library
../man5/intro.5:The manual pages in section 5 contain information related to
../man6/intro.6:The manual
While we don't actually make use of thread scheduling attributes, we do
support setting and retrieving them. However, it doesn't make any sense
to let you set them in a pthread_attr_t...but then ignore that in
pthread_create().
Diff below deletes the duplicated sched_{policy,param} members
Hello!
Just a small patch to fix a typo. Artery T1/E1 drives - Artery
T1/E1 devices
Index: www/57.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/57.html,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -p -u -r1.79 57.html
--- www/57.html 15 Apr 2015 06:29:25 -
Here's a new diff to convert carp_input() to use ether_input_mbuf()
instead of ether_input(). This is a necessary step to be able to
convert other pseudo-drivers to if_input() but it is just needed for
the transition.
This version only call M_PREPEND(9) on mbufs that will be passed to
This diff adds the necessary glue to bridge(4) to be able to convert
other pseudo-drivers to if_input(). This will also help bridge(4)'s
own conversion.
Since bridge_input() already returns a mbuf, I believe this change is
less error prone than the carp(4) one. But I appreciate reviews,
tests
Hi Vadim,
Vadim Zhukov wrote on Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 08:00:22AM +0300:
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2015-04-18 Sat 16:21 PM |, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If the ports infrastructure manual pages were simply part of a package
that is neccessary for building ports, then the manuals
