Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com writes:
So I'll commit your diff; you wanna switch at doing the matching for
-w/-W ?
Ok so hopefully, I think I get this right. With the following /etc/fstab:
8e26a31ab7f46c90.b none swap sw
bf16ae2b23dadbc7.a / ffs rw 1 1
swap /tmp tmpfs
Struct file has reference count f_count field. When f_count 0 file instance
exists, when f_count becomes 0 file instance should be removed. It's simple
but some strange magic exists. When file was created by falloc() it has
f_count == 2. One additional FREF() call was done inside falloc(). After
On 20/04/15(Mon) 18:37, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 22:08 +0300, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14 2015 20:40:58 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
According to 3.2 in RFC 7323:
Once TSopt has been successfully negotiated, that is both SYN and
SYN,ACK contain
Hi,
The Makefile.bsd-wrapper for src/gnu/lib/libiberty is the only such
Makefile (that I could find) that does not quote ${CC} properly.
A trivial patch is attached.
Cheers,
--
:: Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri, Bioinformatics Developer, BILS,
:: Uppsala University, Sweden
Hi!
We've started to generate code coverage reports for test suites of some
projects on a regular basis. You'll find on overview for LibreSSL
(Portable) here:
http://www.opencoverage.net/libressl/index_html/sources.html
Out of 59877 conditions and decisions 13389, or 22.36% were covered
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Vitaliy Makkoveev
kanonenvogel@gmail.com wrote:
Struct file has reference count f_count field. When f_count 0 file
instance
exists, when f_count becomes 0 file instance should be removed. It's simple
but some strange magic exists. When file was created by
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Harri Porten por...@froglogic.com wrote:
Hi!
We've started to generate code coverage reports for test suites of some
projects on a regular basis. You'll find on overview for LibreSSL (Portable)
here:
Hi --
eprely isn't used anymore.
OK?
~Brian
Index: def.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/def.h,v
retrieving revision 1.145
diff -u -p -r1.145 def.h
--- def.h 25 Mar 2015 20:53:31 - 1.145
+++ def.h 7 May 2015
On Apr 30, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 24/04/15(Fri) 20:48, David Higgs wrote:
This is the final patch in the series.
Utilize the pending flags and report callback for their intended purpose -
to process async behavior.
Apply splusb() to ensure report
So I'm not quite sure how to explain this but I'm getting similiar
emails to the one below and it seems like opensmtpd should be rejecting
them as they don't seem like they are a valid format.
Have others seen emails like these? Should opensmtpd be rejecting them?
--
James Turner
From
10 matches
Mail list logo