Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: > Sebastien Marie writes: > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i'm tinkering with ldapd and writing regress tests for it, and to >>> allow running independent instances (with

sdmmc card detect

The Bay Trail SoC SD controller for the SD card slot doesn't use the Card Detect bit in the standard register. Instead there is a separate gpio that signals the presence of a card in the slot. The diff below introduces a function pointer in the sdhc softc that, if non-NULL, gets called instead

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

> From: j...@wxcvbn.org (=?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie_Courr=C3=A8ges-Anglas?=) > Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:23:25 +0100 > > j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes: > > > Sebastien Marie writes: > > > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil

device close error in file system unmount

Hi, When pulling and unmounting an umass USB stick, the file system may end up in an inconsistent state. The fstype dependent mp->mnt_data is NULL, but the general mp is still listed as a valid mount point. Next access to the file system will crash with a NULL pointer dereference. If the close

Re: ntfs uiomove() conversion

Martin Natano wrote: > Below the conversion to uiomove() for ntfs. In the first three hunks the > size passed to uiomove(i) already was of type size_t. I also converted > the 'left' variable in ntfs_readattr() to size_t, because it tracks the > remainder of 'rsize', which also is size_t. Looks

Re: sdmmc card detect

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:06:11PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The Bay Trail SoC SD controller for the SD card slot doesn't use the > Card Detect bit in the standard register. Instead there is a separate > gpio that signals the presence of a card in the slot. The diff below > introduces a

Re: UEFI Boot Report: Screen corruption and kernel panic

> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:14:04 -0500 > From: James Hastings Best not to drop the list. There are other developers that might want to chime in. > On 2/2/16, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 02:09:08 -0500 > >> From: James Hastings

Re: [PATCH] uname, arch/machine -> %c, %a update in PKG_PATH

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 07:28:43PM GMT, Joerg Jung wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:40:17PM +, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Given that PKG_PATH and pkg.conf(5)'s installpath, now supports %c, %a, > > etc. sequences, it might be worth advertising it a bit more by changing > > all

Re: UEFI Boot Report: Screen corruption and kernel panic

> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:32:13 +0100 (CET) > From: Mark Kettenis > > > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:14:04 -0500 > > From: James Hastings > > > > Native screen size is 1366x768 > > > > Results: > > ei.config_acpi: 0x66bfe014 > > ei.config_smbios:

Re: [PATCH] uname, arch/machine -> %c, %a update in PKG_PATH

On 2016/02/02 19:48, Raf Czlonka wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 07:28:43PM GMT, Joerg Jung wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:40:17PM +, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Given that PKG_PATH and pkg.conf(5)'s installpath, now supports %c, %a, > > > etc. sequences, it might be

Re: UEFI Boot Report: Screen corruption and kernel panic

On 2/2/16, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:32:13 +0100 (CET) >> From: Mark Kettenis >> >> > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:14:04 -0500 >> > From: James Hastings >> > >> > Native screen size is 1366x768 >> > >> >

Re: [PATCH] uname, arch/machine -> %c, %a update in PKG_PATH

On 2016/02/02 22:15, Raf Czlonka wrote: > Like I've mentioned above, I'm not particularly fond of it either. > > I merely copied what was already in the FAQ - I wish you had kept the > rest of the diff, but here is a shortened version anyway :^) (sorry, trimming a lot here, otherwise it's harder

Re: [PATCH] uname, arch/machine -> %c, %a update in PKG_PATH

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:48:47PM GMT, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/02/02 22:15, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > Like I've mentioned above, I'm not particularly fond of it either. > > > > I merely copied what was already in the FAQ - I wish you had kept the > > rest of the diff, but here is a

Re: sunxi: don't use sxitimer on the sun7i/A20

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:57:41PM -0200, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:55:57AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > Thanks, both diffs committed. Any chance you could create another to > > move the sxitimer_* globals into the softc? > > I didn't have time to test each diff

Re: [PATCH] uname, arch/machine -> %c, %a update in PKG_PATH

Raf Czlonka wrote: > - ftp.openbsd.org is, AFAIC, overloaded I haven't been following this thread fully, but I agree that ftp.openbsd.org shouldn't be used in examples. Many many people use the default mirror whenever possible.

Re: I have a program I wish to submit for the base

2016-02-01 22:31 GMT+01:00 Luke Small : > > I think that there is some unwritten policy that nobody can get something > like this into the system. Why on earth hasn't this happened yet? > > Yeah, I think that if anyone has something they want into base it should go in, even

Re: multicast, ETOOMANYREFS and intro(2)

On 01/02/16(Mon) 13:15, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:56:01 +0100, > =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie_Courr=C3=A8ges- > Anglas?= wrote: > > > intro(2) describes it as such: > > > > 59 ETOOMANYREFS Too many references: can't splice. Not used in OpenBSD. > > > > Obviously it *is*

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

> Here's a similar diff for ldapctl, thoughts? With your tweaks sounds much better. OK gsoares@

Re: I have a program I wish to submit for the base

On 2016 Feb 01 (Mon) at 15:31:25 -0600 (-0600), Luke Small wrote: :I think that there is some unwritten policy that nobody can get something :like this into the system. Why on earth hasn't this happened yet? Your proposed addition has been rejected, and will continue to be rejected. 1) The code

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

> Thinking about it .. would a call to access(2) with R_OK|W_OK|R_OK|F_OK > satisfy > everyone ? Or only F_OK ? Sounds better than chdir(2), but it will lack if datadir was passed to access(2) without including trailing "/" eg with access(datadir, F_OK): $ touch /home/gsoares/testfile <-

Re: can't run multiple instances of httpd, flags not visible in processes

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:24:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/02/01 15:02, Joerg Jung wrote: > > What about smtpd, should be similar, no? > > This would do the trick. It loses the getrlimit/setrlimit dance that > config_process() normally does, but I'm not sure if that is really >

Re: Add APM_IOC_HIBERNATE to apm.4

> The following patch adds documentation for the APM_IOC_HIBERNATE ioctl > to the manual pages. There was a typo in the zaurus hunk. Updated diff below. Index: share/man/man4/man4.amd64/apm.4 === RCS file:

Re: sunxi: don't use sxitimer on the sun7i/A20

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:55:57AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > Thanks, both diffs committed. Any chance you could create another to > move the sxitimer_* globals into the softc? I didn't have time to test each diff separately, but now my Cubieboard 2 stops at sxidog (log below). I'm expecting

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

Gleydson Soares writes: >> Thinking about it .. would a call to access(2) with R_OK|W_OK|R_OK|F_OK >> satisfy >> everyone ? Or only F_OK ? > > Sounds better than chdir(2), but it will lack if datadir was passed to > access(2) > without including trailing "/" > > eg with

Re: ldapd: add -r option to specify datadir path

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 01:58:18PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Gleydson Soares writes: > > >> Thinking about it .. would a call to access(2) with R_OK|W_OK|R_OK|F_OK > >> satisfy > >> everyone ? Or only F_OK ? > > > > Sounds better than chdir(2), but it will lack