On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:22:23PM +0100, Norman Golisz wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> On Wed Mar 9 2016 10:06, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Lightly tested by myself on amd64, you can help by reviewing and
> > testing this.
>
> I also don't see regressions on my amd64 - running since 3 days on my
>
This doesn't use atomic operation, because:
- hardclock() is the only writer
- Clock interrupt doesn't run simultaneously
- Reading int should be atomic on all architectures
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:13:13PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> This clarifies that the single, global `ticks' is
This clarifies that the single, global `ticks' is owned by kern_clock.c.
timeout(9) is only one of users of `ticks', even though its handler,
timeout_hardclock_update(), is called from hardclock() after update of
`ticks' every time.
Theoretically timecounter(9)'s tick, tc_ticktock(), is
On 2016/03/16 10:53, Damien Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, li...@wrant.com wrote:
>
> > What's going on with the BGP as a transport then, is it available to
> > the general public? Must be much better than the fubar DNS. Nackts
> > thing and we'd be attempting carping on tunnelled over
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> What's going on with the BGP as a transport then, is it available to
> the general public? Must be much better than the fubar DNS. Nackts
> thing and we'd be attempting carping on tunnelled over DNS syndrome.
Years ago I added the pftable keyword
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:52:06 -0400 Michael McConville
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/03/15 12:55, Craig Skinner wrote:
> > > There are a few more paid rsync lists here:
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_blacklists
> >
> > Ah that is a useful page.
I don't see how execute permissions on a file system image would be
useful.
Ok?
Index: newfs_ext2fs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/newfs_ext2fs/newfs_ext2fs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 newfs_ext2fs.c
---
Hi Otto,
On Wed Mar 9 2016 10:06, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Lightly tested by myself on amd64, you can help by reviewing and
> testing this.
I also don't see regressions on my amd64 - running since 3 days on my
production system.
Absolutely not. do not enable a blacklist by default
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Michael McConville wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2016/03/15 12:55, Craig Skinner wrote:
>> > There are a few more paid rsync lists here:
>> >
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:19:53PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:52:35PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > Already shown to a few people, but since pledge(2) aborts on non-dev,
> > > let's
> > > check upfront that we're of the right type.
> > >
> > > I don't think this
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes:
> Nick Permyakov writes:
>
>> Fixed a boot panic on my machine.
>>
>> Index: atascsi.c
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atascsi.c,v
>> retrieving
Nick Permyakov writes:
> Fixed a boot panic on my machine.
>
> Index: atascsi.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atascsi.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.127
> diff -u -p -r1.127 atascsi.c
> --- atascsi.c
ok?
Index: ch.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/less/ch.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 ch.c
--- ch.c27 Dec 2015 17:51:19 - 1.16
+++ ch.c15 Mar 2016 17:18:56 -
@@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ struct
Hi,
in various situations, including directory listings, progress and
diagnostic messages, the sftp(1) and scp(1) programs print untrusted
strings to the local terminal, often strings that were received
from a remote system over the wire, often containing whatever random
filenames on the remote
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> Just wanted to note this diff in combination with your other uvm diff
> does really well on sparc, building ports. Cuts down amap "INUSE" by
> about a factor of 20.
> Will report if anything bad happens.
Cool, thanks for testing as well!
So I plan to commit both diffs if
> > Generally, everything has changed from file feeds to DNS.
>
> Yep, because for the more actively maintained ones 1) new entries show
> up more quickly than any sane rsync interval, this is quite important
> for good blocking these days 2) DNS is less resource intensive and more
> easily
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/03/15 12:55, Craig Skinner wrote:
> > There are a few more paid rsync lists here:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_blacklists
>
> Ah that is a useful page. Maybe we could list it, e.g.
>
> Index: spamd.conf
>
On 2016/03/15 23:34, David Gwynne wrote:
> Can you find any doco that states that? Or any other thing that does it?
IEEE 802.1Q-2014 (https://standards.ieee.org/about/get/802/802.1.html)
section 9.6 (on p160):
0 The null VID. Indicates that the tag header contains only priority
information; no
On 14:57:40, 15.03.16, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:36:21PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> >
> > p_usrpri and p_priority will go away, so userland utilities like 'ps'
> > will need to be changed.
> >
>
> AFAIU, this would hurt interactive programs (audio, players,
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:36:21PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
>
> p_usrpri and p_priority will go away, so userland utilities like 'ps'
> will need to be changed.
>
AFAIU, this would hurt interactive programs (audio, players, games,
etc). Currently i/o bound processes wake up with increased
Can you find any doco that states that? Or any other thing that does it?
On 15 Mar 2016 02:21, "Stuart Henderson" wrote:
> On 2016/03/14 21:13, David Gwynne wrote:
> > this adds macros to describe the min and max valid vlan ids.
> >
> > this will be used in upcoming checks
On 2016/03/15 12:55, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On 2016-03-14 Mon 16:27 PM |, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > There aren't many who provide their whole dataset to anyone other
> > than paying customers - e.g. Spamhaus' rsync feeds are for
> > organisations with >5000 users and cost
Hi Stuart,
On 2016-03-14 Mon 16:27 PM |, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> There aren't many who provide their whole dataset to anyone other
> than paying customers - e.g. Spamhaus' rsync feeds are for
> organisations with >5000 users and cost US$1700+/year.
>
I've found these free rsync feeds
Hi Ricardo,
On 2016-03-14 Mon 16:15 PM |, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
>
> Comments?
>
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=145047019223179
Just wanted to note this diff in combination with your other uvm diff
does really well on sparc, building ports. Cuts down amap "INUSE" by
about a factor of 20.
Will report if anything bad happens.
I'm aware I'm kicking an old horse here, but...
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:52:35PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> @@ -106,5 +108,17 @@ opendev(const char *path, int oflags, in
> if (realpath)
> *realpath = namebuf;
If anything like this goes in (or did it already?) the *realpath
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:02:47PM -0600, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Martin Natano wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:57:36AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> >>
> >> So, does it make sense to put COLUMNS and SIZE forward ?
> >> I think
Hi,
The following diff corrects an evaluation order error and a memory leak
in error code path.
Comments or OK ?
--
Sebastien Marie
Index: sys/kern/kern_pledge.c
===
--- sys/kern/kern_pledge.c.orig 2016-03-15 08:54:33.500610285
Fixed a boot panic on my machine.
Index: atascsi.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atascsi.c,v
retrieving revision 1.127
diff -u -p -r1.127 atascsi.c
--- atascsi.c3 Jan 2016 21:07:46 -1.127
+++ atascsi.c14 Mar 2016
29 matches
Mail list logo