Hi Jack,
I'm not a developer (just a contributor), but I worked on httpd client
certs a year ago, too. (https://marc.info/?t=14528592613=1=2)
I got a private response from a developer, who had an own similar diff
in preparation. He told me that is better to name configuration option
Marc Espie writes:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:40:32PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> Antoine Jacoutot:
>>
>> > Why not just:
>> >
>> > # pkg_add -v rsync chromium emacs--no_x11
>> >
>> > So we don't have to change it each release?
>>
>> Because people won't let
Earlier this evening I proposed a patch that adds support for
requiring/verifying TLS client certificates to httpd. See my last post.
But that only solves half the problem (checking that the client cert
was issued by a locally-trusted CA and has not yet expired).
The other (and in my opinion
One of our sites has a need to require/verify TLS client certs,
without the overhead & complexity of apache / nginx, etc.
OpenBSD's httpd seemed the obvious candidate, and I figured that the
feature would be useful to others too -- see attached diff for an
initial implementation.
Of course,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:40:32PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Antoine Jacoutot:
>
> > Why not just:
> >
> > # pkg_add -v rsync chromium emacs--no_x11
> >
> > So we don't have to change it each release?
>
> Because people won't let Emacs 21 die.
>
> Ambiguous: choose package for
On 03/30/17 08:55, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:44:37AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
>
> Ambiguous: choose package for emacs--no_x11
> a 0:
> 1: emacs-21.4p37-no_x11
> 2: emacs-25.1p3-no_x11
> Your choice:
Time to choose
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:44:37AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> >> > Ambiguous: choose package for emacs--no_x11
> >> > a 0:
> >> > 1: emacs-21.4p37-no_x11
> >> > 2: emacs-25.1p3-no_x11
> >> > Your choice:
> >>
> >> Time to choose another package?
> >
> > I think in this
>> > Ambiguous: choose package for emacs--no_x11
>> > a 0:
>> > 1: emacs-21.4p37-no_x11
>> > 2: emacs-25.1p3-no_x11
>> > Your choice:
>>
>> Time to choose another package?
>
> I think in this case choice is good.
Indeed, but why aren't vim-no_x11 packages listed as