[patch] Change size's type from int to size_t in ldd.c

Hi tech@, I think the type of size variable should be more accurate to use size_t instead of int. Best Regards Nan Xiao Index: ldd.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/libexec/ld.so/ldd/ldd.c,v retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.21 ldd.c

Re: New: netctl(8) - cli network-location manager

* Aaron Poffenberger [2017-09-26 21:53:24 -0500]: > I should add, I thought about adding commands like rcctl's > `get|getdef|set` commands to do full interface configuration (`set > nwid wapname` or `set bssid `) but wanted to get feedback on > the current approach before

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

On 09/28/17 08:43, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: On 09/27/17 18:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: On 09/27/17 00:07, Robert Nagy wrote: Hi This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. This diff is also in snapshots now

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

Hi Robert, Snapshot works pretty well on my new laptop (Intel HD Graphics 510). Resuming is working great! No regression. Thank you! dmesg is attached. There are those error messages : error: [drm:pid0:i915_firmware_load_error_print] *ERROR* failed to load firmware

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

On 09/27/17 18:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > On 09/27/17 00:07, Robert Nagy wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, >> this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. >> >> This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! >

just a few 1<<31 to 1U<<31

Hi, was looking at sdmmc, and then i did remember this rev1.3 commit: http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/armv7/imx/imxccm.c#rev1.3 also fixes those from under sys/dev/fdt and sys/arch/armv7 i found, didn't look elsewhere. -Artturi diff --git a/sys/arch/armv7/imx/imxccm.c

Re: malloc.c: better double free check

> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 09:02:58PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > > > > In the end all double frees still will be caught by the actual free > > > code, just with a delay. The delayed free buffer double free check is > > > just a way of catching it as soon as possible to make debugging > > >

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

On 09/27/17 00:07, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hi > > This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, > this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. > > This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! Installed the latest snapshot (OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP)

Re: sin() implementation

> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > > Even on modern amd64s integer arithmetics and bitwise operations are > > faster (and more precise in many cases) than floating point > > equivalents. > > Can you actually substanciate this claim? The basic x87 instructions >

Re: sin() implementation

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > Even on modern amd64s integer arithmetics and bitwise operations are > faster (and more precise in many cases) than floating point > equivalents. Can you actually substanciate this claim? The basic x87 instructions (FLD, FST,

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

On 2017 Sep 27 (Wed) at 00:07:42 +0200 (+0200), Robert Nagy wrote: : :Hi : :This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, :this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. : :This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! : :Thank you : Works fine on an

clang-local(1) doesn't state that it's not looking in /usr/local.

..whereas gcc-local(1) does, so I lifted that sentence from it. Don't know if that was intentionally left out or not, but since it managed to confuse at least one person recently: $ cvs -q diff -u Index: clang-local.1 === RCS file:

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

Matthieu Herrb writes: > No visible regression so far on my IvyBridge and SandyBridge laptops. Same here on a skylake. -- Manuel Giraud

Re: preliminary kabylake support for inteldrm

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:07:42AM +0200, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hi > > This is an updated diff for preliminary kabylake support for 6.2, > this needs extensive testing on all inteldrm variants. > > This diff is also in snapshots now so please, test, test test! No visible regression so far on

Re: ASCII Drawings in Manual Pages ?

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:41:42AM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote: > Hello Lads, Ladies > what is the consensus about ascii drawings > for Manual pages ? > eg for point to point adddressing could we include > > inet 10.3.4.5 0x 10.1.2.3 > + >

Re: ExposeAuthInfo in sshd_config.5

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:03:11PM +0300, Lars Nood??n wrote: > I would propose the following change, or something similar, to sshd_config.5 > > It is then more clear which options are accepted and how the directive is > used. > > /Lars > morning. tweaked version committed/. jmc > Index:

Re: Xr cos(3) in sin(3)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:21:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Every trigonometric function's manpage references every other, > with a single exception: sin(3) does not Xr cos 3. > > Jan > committed, thanks. jmc > Index: sin.3 >

Re: sin() implementation

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 01:27:52PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > I picked sin() as an example while trying to walk though the implementation > of (pieces of) libm. If someone has the time for it, I have some questions. > > I understand the implementation originaly stems from Sun's libm of 1993. >