Re: [update] base zlib

2018-07-14 Thread David CARLIER
Ah right if it relates to lib 1.2.8 that might do ... On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 19:41, Bryan Steele wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 07:32:23PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > There have been several diffs to update this already, they have been > > rejected (upstream using some things that were

Re: [update] base zlib

2018-07-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
There have been several diffs to update this already, they have been rejected (upstream using some things that were not wanted iirc). -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 14 July 2018 19:01:51 Marc Espie wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 06:15:59PM +0100, David CARLIER

Re: [update] base zlib

2018-07-14 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 06:15:59PM +0100, David CARLIER wrote: > Hi, > > Just to anticipate things, the age of the version starts to show with > some third party softwares, so I was thinking if we could update to > the latest while keeping just the necessary code and backporting our > internal

use BN_swap_ct() instead of BN_consttime_swap() in ec_GF2m_montgomery_point_multiply()

2018-07-14 Thread Theo Buehler
The new BN_swap_ct() API is an improved version of the public BN_consttime_swap() function: it allows for error checking doesn't assert() and has fewer assumptions on the input. This eliminates the last use of the latter in our tree. With the next major libcrypto bump, we could replace

BN_swap_ct() use size_t for byte count

2018-07-14 Thread Theo Buehler
As pointed out by jsing, using size_t for nwords would be more appropriate for the new internal API BN_swap_ct(). Let's switch to it and cast to an int internally after checking the size to avoid overflow. Index: bn/bn_lib.c === RCS

Re: bgpd use struct filterstate in more places

2018-07-14 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2018.07.13 22:39:58 +0200: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 06:37:44PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > This uses struct filterstate in rde_update_dispatch() and passes the > > struct to a few functions down (rde_update_update, path_update and some > > more

Re: bsd.port.mk.5: Remove mention of old man directory

2018-07-14 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:04:55AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > OK? > > Index: man5/bsd.port.mk.5 > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v > retrieving revision 1.486 > diff -u -p -r1.486 bsd.port.mk.5 > ---

bsd.port.mk.5: Remove mention of old man directory

2018-07-14 Thread Klemens Nanni
OK? Index: man5/bsd.port.mk.5 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v retrieving revision 1.486 diff -u -p -r1.486 bsd.port.mk.5 --- man5/bsd.port.mk.5 13 Jul 2018 08:09:34 - 1.486 +++ man5/bsd.port.mk.5 14

Re: nice side-effect, but rebound doesn't play

2018-07-14 Thread Peter J. Philipp
oops I just realised I never activated rebound by putting a nameserver entry for 127.0.0.1 at the top of the nameservers list. This makes my patch broken then since I tested it and it could only find the lookup once and then refused any more queries after that. Sorry about that! However in