remove src/sys/netinet/ip_ether.c because it is not used

2019-10-04 Thread David Gwynne
jca@ has already oked this. anyone else want to get on board? Index: ip_ether.c === RCS file: ip_ether.c diff -N ip_ether.c --- ip_ether.c 10 Feb 2018 08:12:01 - 1.99 +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 - @@ -1,28 +0,0

Re: Attach Hyper-V guest services to VMBus 4.0

2019-10-04 Thread Andre Stoebe
On 04.10.2019 15:54, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > Thanks a lot for dmesgs. Do I understand correctly that paravirtualized > disk and network work fine for you regardless of whether OpenBSD-current, > attached one-liner diff or the linked larger diff are used? > > With best regards, > Mike I'm not

Re: Attach Hyper-V guest services to VMBus 4.0

2019-10-04 Thread Mike Belopuhov
Andre Stoebe writes: > On 03.10.2019 02:13, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >> And what about OpenBSD-current or an attached patch as opposed >> to the linked one? >> >> Please don't go half the way if you're willing to help us out, >> we'd like to make OpenBSD 6.6-release work in these setups >>

Re: Minor vi MAN helper/precisions

2019-10-04 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:35:40PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/10/04 07:22, sven falempin wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:29 AM Stuart Henderson > > wrote: > > > > > On 2019/10/03 11:56, sven falempin wrote: > > > > BTW, on modern system RAM is plentiful while SSD are not

[patch] www.openbsd.org/events.html

2019-10-04 Thread Mischa
Hi All, Does it make sense to add my talk on vmm/vmd at EuroBSDCon to the events.html page? If it does, below is the diff. (Thanx Paul! :)) Mischa Index: events.html === RCS file: /home/OpenBSD/cvs/www/events.html,v retrieving

Re: Minor vi MAN helper/precisions

2019-10-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/10/04 07:22, sven falempin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:29 AM Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2019/10/03 11:56, sven falempin wrote: > > > BTW, on modern system RAM is plentiful while SSD are not always '/tmp' > > > friendly. > > > > Some of the slower media (CF/SD cards etc) might

Re: Minor vi MAN helper/precisions

2019-10-04 Thread sven falempin
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:29 AM Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/10/03 11:56, sven falempin wrote: > > BTW, on modern system RAM is plentiful while SSD are not always '/tmp' > > friendly. > > Some of the slower media (CF/SD cards etc) might have issues eventually but > I would expect anything

bgpd fix for pftable panic

2019-10-04 Thread Claudio Jeker
Because of delaying the commits in the RDE it is now possible that table additions and deletions mix. This triggers a fatal("attempt to mix pf table additions/deletions") in the parent. Instead of the fatal() it is actually safe to just commit the pending work and start with a fresh worklist

Re: Minor vi MAN helper/precisions

2019-10-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/10/03 11:56, sven falempin wrote: > BTW, on modern system RAM is plentiful while SSD are not always '/tmp' > friendly. Some of the slower media (CF/SD cards etc) might have issues eventually but I would expect anything worthy of the name 'SSD' should be fine. > Using tmpfs for /tmp, vi

Re: smtpd handling of \r in DATA part

2019-10-04 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:09:06AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > On 10/4/19 10:03 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > > October 4, 2019 9:55 AM, "Martijn van Duren" > > wrote: > >> > >> This is similar to the diff I send a few months ago, but still doesn't > >> fix the case when someone sends a

Re: smtpd handling of \r in DATA part

2019-10-04 Thread Martijn van Duren
On 10/4/19 10:03 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > October 4, 2019 9:55 AM, "Martijn van Duren" > wrote: >> >> This is similar to the diff I send a few months ago, but still doesn't >> fix the case when someone sends a standalone '\n' as line-ending. >> > > Unsure I understand that, can you

Re: smtpd handling of \r in DATA part

2019-10-04 Thread gilles
October 4, 2019 9:55 AM, "Martijn van Duren" wrote: > > This is similar to the diff I send a few months ago, but still doesn't > fix the case when someone sends a standalone '\n' as line-ending. > Unsure I understand that, can you elaborate ? > I'd prefer if we go with reverting (=my

Re: src/sys/netinet/ip_ether.c is empty, and also not used by gif

2019-10-04 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Fri, Oct 04 2019, David Gwynne wrote: > so we can remove it, starting with taking it out of sys/conf/files. > > ok? I once had a similar diff. ok for this and the ip_ether.c removal. > Index: files > === > RCS file:

Re: smtpd handling of \r in DATA part

2019-10-04 Thread Martijn van Duren
On 10/4/19 9:36 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 08:43:28AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: annoying bumps will just be moved around. If we *really* want to fix this we need to make it fit within the specifications: [...] This means stop

Re: smtpd handling of \r in DATA part

2019-10-04 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 08:43:28AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > >> annoying bumps will just be moved around. If we *really* want to fix > >> this we need to make it fit within the specifications: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> This means stop opportunistic scanning for '\r' in iobuf! > >> > > > >

Re: smtpd handling of \r in DATA part

2019-10-04 Thread Martijn van Duren
On 10/4/19 8:23 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 07:35:39AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: >> On 10/3/19 9:05 PM, Eric Faurot wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 05:48:17PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote: >>> > To me, the only real problem with '\r' is at the end of lines.

Re: smtpd handling of \r in DATA part

2019-10-04 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 07:35:39AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > On 10/3/19 9:05 PM, Eric Faurot wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 05:48:17PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > > > >>> To me, the only real problem with '\r' is at the end of lines. It's > >>> confusing > >>> since you never