Hello tech@,
I keep getting a syntax error with the following seemingly correct
line:
filter "dkimsign-override" phase commit \
match mail-from bypass
The problem (`/etc/mail/smtpd.conf:20: syntax error`) arises from
smtpd.conf's grammar only allowing
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:03:54PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:18:48PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
> > Not to provoke a deep philosophical debate about the difference between
> > Ql, Cm, and Sy, but surely Em isn't the best choice here. A couple other
> > nits that
i've discusssed this offline with florian (many times, over the years)
It is quite possible there will be subtle behaviour changes, but in a
system configuration where "other programs on the machine are using also
ports quickly", we both expect unbound will behave *better* using kernel
support
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 07:06:26PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 06:42:02PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> > To clarify, this is independent of my recent work in
> > in6_ifawithscope(), -ifa did not work with the old code, either.
> >
>
> Of course ! Sorry if my message
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:39:09 +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> With the update sthen@ just put in we can enable this:
>
> --disable-explicit-port-randomisation
> disable explicit source port randomisation and rely
> on the kernel to provide random
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 02:32:57PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
Hello.
I pointed some comments inline.
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:15:08 +0300
> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > I like your idea to kill `pipex_iface_context'. I had trying to keep it
> > by
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 06:42:02PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> To clarify, this is independent of my recent work in
> in6_ifawithscope(), -ifa did not work with the old code, either.
>
Of course ! Sorry if my message led to think you were responsible for it.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 05:34:09PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> While working on source selection, I noticed the IPv6 source was not honored
> when set from route(8) with -ifa.
>
> After discussing with florian@, here is a proposed change. It chooses the
> source
> address associated with the
While working on source selection, I noticed the IPv6 source was not honored
when set from route(8) with -ifa.
After discussing with florian@, here is a proposed change. It chooses the source
address associated with the route (hence honoring -ifa) instead of the first
address of the output
With the update sthen@ just put in we can enable this:
--disable-explicit-port-randomisation
disable explicit source port randomisation and rely
on the kernel to provide random source ports
OK?
diff --git Makefile.bsd-wrapper
Hello,
>
> Admins using `once' rules are hopefully aware of this caveat already,
> but now the checksum actually indicates out-of-sync rulesets and does
> no longer present the same checksum for different rulesets.
>
> Feedback? OK?
>
>
OK sashan@
11 matches
Mail list logo