Re: usbhidctl: add -R flag to dump raw report descriptor bytes

2021-05-28 Thread joshua stein
On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 08:13:52 +0200, Anton Lindqvist wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 08:31:14AM +0200, Anton Lindqvist wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:17:26AM -0500, joshua stein wrote: > > > This is useful for parsing the report descriptor with a different > > > tool to find issues with

Re: Thread Local Storage in clang

2021-05-28 Thread Brad Smith
On 5/28/2021 10:55 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote: I tried to compile librdkafka on OpenBSD 6.5 (clang 7.0.1) and clang compiled the __thread parts with some built-in mechanism. I upgraded the system to OpenBSD 6.9 and TLS is no longer supported by the in-tree clang. Was this intended to be turned

Re: Thread Local Storage in clang

2021-05-28 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Marc Espie [es...@nerim.net] wrote: > > Thinking some more about it, I would suspect the configury stuff in that > library to expect native support... tls doesn't work on OpenBSD unless you > respect the toolchain. > > in particular, it won't fly without the support library (the emutls stuff >

Re: setitimer(2): don't round up it_value

2021-05-28 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 08:15:20AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:29:04 -0500 > > From: Scott Cheloha > > Sorry, but does is one of those areas where I'm not very aware how the > interfaces are used by applications. So my default position is: > "don't change it".

Re: Thread Local Storage in clang

2021-05-28 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 06:56:42PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 07:55:39AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > > I tried to compile librdkafka on OpenBSD 6.5 (clang 7.0.1) and clang > > compiled > > the __thread parts with some built-in mechanism. I upgraded the system to > >

Re: Thread Local Storage in clang

2021-05-28 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 07:55:39AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > I tried to compile librdkafka on OpenBSD 6.5 (clang 7.0.1) and clang compiled > the __thread parts with some built-in mechanism. I upgraded the system to > OpenBSD 6.9 and TLS is no longer supported by the in-tree clang. Was this >

Re: setitimer(2): don't round up it_value

2021-05-28 Thread Scott Cheloha
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 08:15:20AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:29:04 -0500 > > From: Scott Cheloha > > Sorry, but does is one of those areas where I'm not very aware how the > interfaces are used by applications. So my default position is: > "don't change it".

Thread Local Storage in clang

2021-05-28 Thread Chris Cappuccio
I tried to compile librdkafka on OpenBSD 6.5 (clang 7.0.1) and clang compiled the __thread parts with some built-in mechanism. I upgraded the system to OpenBSD 6.9 and TLS is no longer supported by the in-tree clang. Was this intended to be turned off? Did the 6.5 version even work? Is Thread

Re: timeout.h: remove API documentation comment

2021-05-28 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 06:29:51PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > All of this information (and more) is in the timeout(9) manpage. > > Can I kill this comment? ok mvs@ > > Index: timeout.h > === > RCS file:

Re: mandoc: -Tlint: search /usr/local/man as well

2021-05-28 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 10:23:31PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Klemens, > > Klemens Nanni wrote on Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 09:33:13PM +0200: > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:47:58PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > >> Klemens Nanni wrote on Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 03:54:43PM +0200: > >>> On Sun, Apr

snmpd(8) Better traphandler flow

2021-05-28 Thread Martijn van Duren
As the original comment said: /* * This should probably go into parsevarbinds, but that's for a * next refactor */ This moves the pdu parsing of traps into parsevarbinds. Added bonus, we can now see the packets in debugging mode: startup snmpe: listening on udp 127.0.0.1:162 ktable_new: new

Re: setitimer(2): don't round up it_value

2021-05-28 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:29:04 -0500 > From: Scott Cheloha Sorry, but does is one of those areas where I'm not very aware how the interfaces are used by applications. So my default position is: "don't change it". Especially since these are "legacy" interfaces. > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at

Re: systat(1) sticky help

2021-05-28 Thread Martijn van Duren
Any takers? martijn@ On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 19:33 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote: > I send out an earlier version of this diff to Anindya with some positive > feedback. Instead of claiming another binding, why not make help, order > and view a toggle? I see no reason why this information should