On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 07:51:45AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> At this point conn->last_modified may or may not be allocated.
> If it is, overriting it will leak 30 bytes.
rrdp_input_handler() has a leak of the same kind.
Index: http.c
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:30:46PM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> I was reminded that fw_update(8) updates the package database without
> locking currently. That can cause issues when running it concurrently
> with pkg_add, for example starting `pkg_add -u` in one terminal and
> `sysupgrade`
At this point conn->last_modified may or may not be allocated.
If it is, overriting it will leak 30 bytes.
Index: http.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/http.c,v
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -p -r1.52 http.c
---
I was reminded that fw_update(8) updates the package database without
locking currently. That can cause issues when running it concurrently
with pkg_add, for example starting `pkg_add -u` in one terminal and
`sysupgrade` in another.
This diff checks to see if perl is available and if so starts a
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:59:41PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> We should not use CRLs if now isn't between thisUpdate and nextUpdate.
> This also ensures that thisUpdate <= nextUpdate. While the verifier will
> catch all this, doing this early will often remove one of the two
> possible choices
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:35:58 +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On clang we can use __has_feature(), but that doesn't exist on
> gcc which defines __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ if it compiles with
> -fsanitize=address.
>
> This doesn't warn on sparc64 and works in my test setups.
It's a little ugly but since
On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 19:37:26 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> - pledge(2) initially with "stdio rpath" at the top of main().
> We know we need to read a file at this point but don't yet
> know which one.
>
> - pledge(2) down to "stdio" after we have opened the file
> in question and called
> From: Dave Voutila
> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:28:48 -0500
>
> I believe I got this from mlarkin@. Realized I've been carrying it in my
> local tree.
>
> Microsoft decided to do all sorts of atypical things with the Go3 in
> ACPI. One is the battery.
>
> ok?
Funny how even Microsoft manages
I believe I got this from mlarkin@. Realized I've been carrying it in my
local tree.
Microsoft decided to do all sorts of atypical things with the Go3 in
ACPI. One is the battery.
ok?
-dv
diff 555fd15dcf830b9fb7a50490d9996f605a238ab5
12b5e3cfa4623c60f84e61950df48b71cf2d8ef0
blob -
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:24:19 +
> From: Visa Hankala
>
> This embeds klist head in struct acpi_softc so that explicit malloc is
> not needed. The head is initialized as part of acpi_softc allocation.
>
> OK?
ok kettenis@
> Index: dev/acpi/acpi.c
>
This embeds klist head in struct acpi_softc so that explicit malloc is
not needed. The head is initialized as part of acpi_softc allocation.
OK?
Index: dev/acpi/acpi.c
===
RCS file: src/sys/dev/acpi/acpi.c,v
retrieving revision
We should not use CRLs if now isn't between thisUpdate and nextUpdate.
This also ensures that thisUpdate <= nextUpdate. While the verifier will
catch all this, doing this early will often remove one of the two
possible choices of a CRL to use for a MFT since these are typically
short-lived. While
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 01:29:42AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There were some problems with ix(4) and ixl(4) hardware checksumming
> for the output path on strict alignment architectures.
>
> I have merged jan@'s diffs and added some sanity checks and
> workarounds.
>
> - If the
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:45:09PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:09:35AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > In libressl-portable we run the explicit_bzero tests as part of the
> > builds. If we enable ASAN on linux, this test segfaults in
> > __interceptor_memmem() in the
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:09:35AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> In libressl-portable we run the explicit_bzero tests as part of the
> builds. If we enable ASAN on linux, this test segfaults in
> __interceptor_memmem() in the two test_with{,out}_bzero() functions,
> presumably because the
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 07:32:38AM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 06:55:21PM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb
In libressl-portable we run the explicit_bzero tests as part of the
builds. If we enable ASAN on linux, this test segfaults in
__interceptor_memmem() in the two test_with{,out}_bzero() functions,
presumably because the sigaltstack magic is too low level for ASAN to
grok.
Would the patch below
17 matches
Mail list logo