I noticed that when I ran strlcpy in cc with both directly from libc and
copied from source: “with and without needing a return value”, the libc
strlcpy didn’t change the runtime, but the one from source did;
dramatically (like 50% runtime difference over a several run loop with
15-20 or so
Hello,
I've spotted this glitch while hunting down use after-free
in 'veb' packet path. I believe the issue is rather hypothetical,
there is no evidence the deemed memory leak ever occurred.
Anyway I believe the if_vinput() should always consume packet
by either passing it further when
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 06:47:32AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 03:57:39PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 05/06/22(Sun) 05:20, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > > Encountered the following panic:
> > > >
> >
> On 6 Jun 2022, at 18:08, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:03:06AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'll commit one-liner diff on Tuesday morning (Jun 6th) Prague time without
>> explicit OK, unless there will be no objection.
>
> The diff is OK
On 06/06/22(Mon) 06:47, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 03:57:39PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 05/06/22(Sun) 05:20, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > > Encountered the following panic:
> > > >
> > > > panic: kernel
On 4.6.2022. 21:23, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 1.6.2022. 11:21, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> I moved the switch to ifconfig(8) in the diff below.
>>
>> # ifconfig ix0 tso
>> # ifconfig ix0 -tso
>>
>> I named it tso (TCP segment offloading), so I can reuse this switch
>> also for the sending part. TSO
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:03:06AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll commit one-liner diff on Tuesday morning (Jun 6th) Prague time without
> explicit OK, unless there will be no objection.
The diff is OK claudio@.
> regards
> sashan
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 09:44:45AM
