Not sure if you've seen it, but ipmi(4) has been disabled for over 12
years, because it's broken on some machines, so, this code is not
necessarily guaranteed to be correct as-is.
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GENERIC#rev1.632
Hi Marcus,
Sounds interesting! I don't know if you've seen it, but I did a
similar patchset back in the day, alas for the common PC desktops with
the lm(4) sensors; http://sensors.cnst.su/fanctl/ . However, there
hasn't been as much interest in fan control on OpenBSD as I had
initially expected
On 2019-W14-1 19:12 -0700, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> Realistically, we need to move to the one true firewall-- iptables!
> Ideally, OpenBSD needs a firewall thats 'web scale' that can be
> administered from a PHP web based frontend that uses JSON message
> passing for clustering and failover.
Wouldn't this break sensorsd? (It's already been converted to use pledge.)
C.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 20:19, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> We recently had a thread about adding more sensors, but then the browser will
> use them to spy on us, and everybody was sad. We allow hw.sensors even for
> pledge
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:48:10 -0400
> From: lice...@openssl.org
> To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
> Subject: OpenSSL License change
[...]
> We are asking for your permission to change the licence for your
> contribution. Please visit this link to respond; you will have a chance
[...]
> If we
As reported elsewhere (http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q4/87 via
http://www.opennet.ru/43146), both of these errors were introduced as
part of the refactoring.
Quick glance through
http://bxr.su/o/lib/libssl/src/crypto/objects/obj_dat.c#OBJ_obj2txt
indicates that the memory leak issue was
On 20 February 2015 at 10:36, Greg Martin g...@softsprocket.com wrote:
Hi,
I just build libressl on Linux 3.13.0-44-generic. I haven't installed it
yet but it was a clean build.
I'm interested in trying libssl but the only documentation I've found is
a single manpage (tls_int). Are there
On 2013-W40-2 16:56 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:26:20 -0700, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Whereas it remains to be seen what kind of bug I'm facing here
(Google reveals I'm not alone), it would appear that changes
introduced in 5.4-current would no longer cause
Hello,
On OpenBSD 5.2 amd64, my spamd (which is used very selectively through
pf(4)) seems to have died 20 days ago, after continuously running for
many months, with the following final words in the logs:
Sep 10 09:49:25 Cns spamd[5220]: 87.225.1.10: connected (1/1), lists:
spamd-greytrap
Sep
On 2013-W10-3 15:46 -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
Yes, one could log stuff into different pflog interfaces, but I don't
understand why pf.conf `pass in ... log ... port smtp ...` is effectively
redefined to mean `add spamd-white` when spamlogd is running,
on egress proto tcp from spamd-white to any port smtp
pass out log on egress proto tcp to any port smtp
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:04:22PM -0800, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 2013-W10-3 15:46 -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
Yes, one could log stuff into different pflog interfaces, but I don't
On 2013-W10-4 19:20 -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
I think this should not only be addressed in the documentation (for
pcap-filter, spamd -M / spamlogd, pf.conf log/rdr-to / pflogd,
tcpdump), but in the actual spamlogd code changes, too -- it should
be smart enough to not automatically whitelist
Hi,
I've started using spamlogd, and since then, every single
connection attempt results in the host being whitelisted.
I log some `rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port spamd` connection attempts into pflog,
and it would seem like spamlogd filter (for port 25)
is picking up the original dport, not the
connections *stay* whitelisted.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Constantine A. Murenin c...@cns.su wrote:
Hi,
I've started using spamlogd, and since then, every single connection attempt
results in the host being whitelisted.
I log some `rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port spamd` connection attempts
-3 14:56 -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
No constatine - that is not the best approach. if you are whitelisting
grelisted connections
or blacklisted connections that are blocked you have your pf.conf or
spamlogd setup wrong.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Constantine A. Murenin c...@cns.su wrote:
Bob, I
Constantine A. Murenin cnst+open...@bugmail.mojo.ru
+ *
+ * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
+ * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
+ * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED
16 matches
Mail list logo
