I don't understand what you mean by hang? Does it hang the box? I would
expect dhclient to reject the offer and try again. Does dhclient never try
again?
I'll take a closer look tomorrow, but if it isn't now it should be easy to
fix dhclient to try again for a different lease.
Ken
On 7 Dec
On 22 July 2015 at 12:36, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
CAVEAT: The metadata version has changed so new volumes you create
will not be loadable on boxes running older versions of OpenBSD.
CAVEAT: You can't rebuild a volume created with *only* 512-byte
On 22 July 2015 at 18:27, Karel Gardas gard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Kenneth Westerback
kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 July 2015 at 12:36, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
CAVEAT: The metadata version has changed so new volumes
Using DUIDs in the installed /etc/fstab has been the default for some time now.
We'd like to eliminate the question in the installer and just use
DUIDs unconditionally.
But first we need to know you are aware of any circumstances where
people need or prefer to use the non-DUID option when
On 15 March 2015 at 23:38, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
The only thing I'd like to have is a command or easy way
to convert a duid to a /dev/sd0a name to use current - or future -
utilities that don't support DUID like badblocks from e2fsprogs
in ports...
In disklabel, you
The OpenBSD Foundation is pleased to announce that we have been
accepted as a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2015.
As such if you are a student who qualifies to apply for GSOC, you will
be able to find us in Google's Summer of Code Application process.For
details on the
On 17 June 2014 17:43, Tobias Stoeckmann tob...@stoeckmann.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:43:02PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
FreeBSD fixed this by increasing the malloc size:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/r126086
Which is actually the correct way to do here!
On 17 June 2014 18:09, Tobias Stoeckmann tob...@stoeckmann.org wrote:
Hi,
fsck_msdos checks for linked cluster chains, which means that two chains
cross each other at the same cluster. If 1 links to 3 and 2 links to 3,
the cluster chains starting at 1 and 2 are linked.
This error condition
On 14 June 2014 09:09, Tobias Stoeckmann tob...@stoeckmann.org wrote:
Hi,
fsck_msdos is prone to an infinite loop if cluster chains in the
filesystem are infinite: FAT handles clusters as linked lists, and at
worst this list can be cyclic.
Android included a fix from Samsung for this issue,
On 14 June 2014 11:57, Tobias Stoeckmann tob...@stoeckmann.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:25:22AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
/* follow the chain to its end (hopefully) */
- for (p = head;
+ for (len = fat[head].length, p = head
On 12 June 2014 15:59, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote:
Ted Unangst:
-intblockswritten; /* number of blocks written on current tape */
+off_t blockswritten; /* number of blocks written on current tape */
time_t tstart_writing; /* when started writing the
On 8 June 2014 11:14, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
since no consensus could be found yet for a new command line option to
ifconfig, heck, not even about wether it is needed, I propose this for
now.
1) make ifconfig if inet6 eui64 reset the NOINET6 flag
unconditionally, so
On 28 May 2014 10:15, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 15:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 08:03, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
[...]
dhclient used to create such routes but that was removed as useless so
I'm not sure why we want/need to add them back
On 28 May 2014 10:18, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 May 2014 10:15, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 15:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 08:03, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
[...]
dhclient used to create such routes
On 26 May 2014 06:10, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
Diff below changes the behavior of the kernel to add a route for every
new IPv4 address, when it is configured on an interface. Actually
such route is created the first time a program tries to resolve it.
That's why with
On 22 May 2014 07:29, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Hi,
some stats are always computed. Move them under #ifdef MALLOC_STATS
And a small thing for error reporting.
ok?
Makes sense to me, looks good. ok krw@
Ken
-Otto
Index: malloc.c
On 16 May 2014 12:54, Todd C. Miller todd.mil...@courtesan.com wrote:
Currently, if you have a host netgroup with an unresolvable hostname,
the file system will not be exported to any of the netgroup members.
This is because we don't zero out grp before reusing it when a host
is unresolvable.
On 16 May 2014 15:00, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was configuring one new interface in one of my new machines, and I
disabled ipv6 with -inet6 as I always do. But I handcrafted the
hostname.if file and forgot to put a NONE in the broadcast address. This
caused
On 14 May 2014 18:14, Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
so as discussed recently having the inet6 link-local addrs on every
interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
Connecting a computer to the internet is
On 13 May 2014 21:09, Mike Larkin mlar...@azathoth.net wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:01:28AM +0900, SASANO Takayoshi wrote:
Hi, Mike.
+ val = 0x501f;
+ idx = 0xd90a;
What are these magic numbers?
These numbers come from Linux driver (ch341.c). I don't know what they mean.
Maybe
On 11 May 2014 05:26, Creamy cre...@dishplanning.com wrote:
Hello again!
OK, this time it's a bug, (or is it a feature?), in dhclient.
Imagine that you have two separate wireless networks, which operate
independently using the same private address spaces and offer leases
based on the same
On 11 May 2014 06:03, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 May 2014 05:26, Creamy cre...@dishplanning.com wrote:
Hello again!
OK, this time it's a bug, (or is it a feature?), in dhclient.
Imagine that you have two separate wireless networks, which operate
independently
On 11 May 2014 06:38, Creamy cre...@dishplanning.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 06:03:24AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
On 11 May 2014 05:26, Creamy cre...@dishplanning.com wrote:
Hello again!
OK, this time it's a bug, (or is it a feature?), in dhclient.
Imagine that you have
On 11 May 2014 07:00, Creamy cre...@dishplanning.com wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 06:31:23AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
On 11 May 2014 06:03, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 May 2014 05:26, Creamy cre...@dishplanning.com wrote:
Hello again!
OK, this time
On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org writes:
[...]
Does no one want to
On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Fritjof
On 6 May 2014 06:42, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
This fixes a bug with mtime not updated after file creation on ext2+
file systems. Try it yourself:
# mount -t ext2fs /dev/sd0o /mnt
# cp /tmp/qq /mnt
# ls -l /mnt/qq
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10 Jan 1 1970 qq
#
On 6 May 2014 11:45, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
Hi,
if somebody wants to commit, ok schwarze@.
Otherwise, i'm accepting OKs.
See inline for a note on the history.
Yours,
Ingo
Makes sense to me ok krw@, unless a history buff speaks up for it.
Ken
Tristan Le Guern
On 6 May 2014 15:12, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote:
06.05.2014 19:36 пользователь Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com
написал:
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
This fixes a bug with mtime not updated after file creation on ext2+
file systems. Try it yourself:
# mount -t
On 3 May 2014 20:29, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Chris Hettrick
ch...@foo.structfoo.comwrote:
I was too ambitious with the previous diffs. Here they are again.
First diff is whitespace only that can be checked with tr and md5.
Second diff is
On 2 May 2014 13:24, Bob Beck b...@obtuse.com wrote:
Honestly folks, I'm sick of the attitude of The future is nigh, the
mystic portal awaits! V6 is coming! as an excuse for
we *MUST* change things related to this.
We've been hearing the mystic portal awaits for 15 years - and yet
MANY of us
On 2 May 2014 16:08, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
| * Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl [2014-05-02 21:20]:
| On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
| [connectivity via link-local]
| |
On 2 May 2014 16:25, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com
wrote:
-inet6 as the default seems more OpenBSD'ish to me. Everything off
that can be off, but not more.
That is not off which can eternal lie
On 30 April 2014 10:55, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:00:45 +0200
On 30 April 2014 15:55, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mark Kettenis
On 29 April 2014 08:57, Simon Perreault si...@per.reau.lt wrote:
Le 2014-04-28 18:43, Kenneth Westerback a écrit :
Why is the burden on everyone to provide 'valid' objections?
I know that what I proposed cannot go in at the moment. It's my end
goal. Now what I want is to have a clear picture
On 29 April 2014 09:59, Simon Perreault si...@per.reau.lt wrote:
Le 2014-04-29 09:44, Kenneth Westerback a écrit :
Why would having the IPv6 addresses come first in the returned list be
required to 'use' them? Please explain.
Well I thought this would be obvious, but applications using
On 29 April 2014 10:42, Dimitris Papastamos s...@2f30.org wrote:
Not sure this is sensible as it encourages people to simply
update the table.
I was inclined to remove the code entirely but I am not sure
what broken systems might rely on this.
Only build tested.
Thoughts?
Index:
On 29 April 2014 12:57, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote:
On 2014-04-29, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Google's data [1] shows a few third-world countries where what you say
is true, plus Japan because of a single particularly broken ISP [2].
Isn't there a
On 28 April 2014 18:05, Simon Perreault si...@per.reau.lt wrote:
Tech,
Now that my AI_ADDRCONFIG diff is in, it's time to reveal my evil master plan:
make getaddrinfo() return IPv6 results first by default.
Why is the burden on everyone to provide 'valid' objections? Should
not the burden be
On 26 April 2014 06:21, Patrik Lundin patrik.lundin@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have tried out the autoinstall functionality and it worked great. The
install log turning up as an email was a very nice touch.
One thing that I was thinking about when looking at the examples in
On 26 April 2014 07:45, Patrik Lundin patrik.lundin@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 07:21:28AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
Assuming you mean dhclient.conf and not dhcpd.conf, the hostname of
the system is not currently set by dhclient even if it is supplied.
The install
On 22 April 2014 08:49, Vadim Lebedev va...@mbdsys.com wrote:
Hello folks,
The removal of OPENSSL_malloc/OPENSSL_free ...
etc will cause a LOT of pain There is non négligeable number of
applications which are strongly depending on this functionality,
they use it for example to allocate
On 15 April 2014 08:34, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:32:43PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
so i got gdb back to the machine because i cannot reproduce outside of the
box.
gdb too old cannot gcore.
The state is nasty, but i do get the trace of the dhcp
On 12 April 2014 10:47, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:56:52 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
Meanwhile, OpenBSD doesn't have the 100% 2008.1 beef stamp on its hind
quarters but will compile and run code having those
functions..which is better?
Best for
On 11 March 2014 23:43, Lawrence Teo l...@openbsd.org wrote:
This changes a few malloc()+memset() calls to calloc().
OK?
Index: gencode.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libpcap/gencode.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -p
On Mar 7, 2014 1:10 PM, Wade, Daniel dw...@meridium.com wrote:
I've been dual booting for years and never once use dd to copy the
openbsd.pbr
If I'm in windows world and want to boot into OpenBSD I run diskpart and
flip the active partition.
Same in the other direction, fdisk -e and flip the
On 4 March 2014 08:41, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Installing the snapshot on external HD,
when using W for all disk the installer created only a very small
Partition (Disk was clean, all 4 base partitions empty.
Not present in 5.4 (i tried, it creates the layout, then i use
On 4 March 2014 12:59, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
I did it again with another disk:
Which disk is the root disk? ('?' for details) [sd0]
Use DUIDs rather than device names in fstab? [yes]
Disk: sd0 geometry: 500/8/32 [312581808 Sectors]
Offset: 0
On 21 February 2014 23:31, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
I can see why this one goes unnoticed.
When I grab a snapshot and install on a test machine I make a practice
of deleting the k partition because I don't need it and it takes ages
to newfs it. (Slow Atom box)
Today it
On 22 February 2014 07:03, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 February 2014 23:31, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
I can see why this one goes unnoticed.
When I grab a snapshot and install on a test machine I make a practice
of deleting the k partition because I
On 21 February 2014 18:21, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I would like to thank the members of the community who deliver four
vax machines to the project.
Vax builds have started again!
Snaps at 11! (i.e. November). :-)
Ken
Zap++
Ken
On 16 February 2014 10:47, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:39:15 +0100
From: Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de
Hi,
the file /usr/share/misc/man.template is horribly outdated and
incomplete, compare it to mdoc.template in the same
On 14 February 2014 14:37, Valer Mischenko
vmische...@openinventionnetwork.com wrote:
Hi the OpenBSD team,
Ken Westerback advised me to appeal to you as a collective.
Well, my exact word were
You can try appealing to tech@openbsd.org, but I'd rate the chances of
a previously secret
I agree. ok krw@
Ken
On 13 February 2014 11:54, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
replace some calls to atoi with strtonum so that netstat -w 0 doesn't
do weird stuff.
Index: main.c
===
RCS file:
On 13 February 2014 17:39, Todd C. Miller todd.mil...@courtesan.com wrote:
Correct, though I prefer the following for clarity.
- todd
Index: lib/libc/time/strptime.c
===
RCS file:
ok krw@
On 5 February 2014 13:15, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 01:49:24AM -0500, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
It appeared in revision 1.3 (Update from lite2.)
It's the only one in the string family that has it, and nothing from it
is used.
I think this
We did print the whole blowfish implementation on the back of a t-shirt,
and I can still read mine. So a key should not be a problem. :-)
. Ken
On 23 January 2014 09:13, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
(IIRC somebody
*But what is the practical problem being addressed? Is dhcp not functional
with the existing default **ruleset?*
* Ken*
On 19 January 2014 19:39, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500,
send_packet() sends packets out a raw socket unless the destination is
INADDR_BROADCAST, in which case it sends the packet out via bpf.
Ken
On 19 Jan 2014 17:33, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at
Rfc 3442 is what I referred to.
Ken
On 3 Dec 2013 22:54, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
Located here, the addition of the 255.255.255.255 route is not done in
the
presence of
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 07:03:54PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
this was probably meant to be aforementioned.
jmc
And you could take out all the agony by saying:
in the same address space as the revisions mentioned
61 matches
Mail list logo
