Re: [PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 09:53:38AM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > It is not that simple because newaliases works when you have one aliases > > database (e.g. /etc/mail/aliases). This is the case on the default setup > >

Re: [PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > It is not that simple because newaliases works when you have one aliases > database (e.g. /etc/mail/aliases). This is the case on the default setup > but smtpd supports per-rule aliases mappings and for example the MX

Re: [PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:59:08AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/05/31 11:10, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:49:18AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > On May 31, 2017 11:35:28 AM GMT+02:00, Consus wrote: > > > >OpenBSD defaults to file table now

Re: [PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/05/31 11:10, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:49:18AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On May 31, 2017 11:35:28 AM GMT+02:00, Consus wrote: > > >OpenBSD defaults to file table now so there is no need in running > > >newaliases(8). > > >--- > > >

Re: [PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Consus
On 11:49 Wed 31 May, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > I proposed the same a while ago but people preferred to keep it in > regard to other MTA. Maybe it's time to revisit ? Looks like I already have proposed it last September. Totally forgot =/

Re: [PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:49:18AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On May 31, 2017 11:35:28 AM GMT+02:00, Consus wrote: > >OpenBSD defaults to file table now so there is no need in running > >newaliases(8). > >--- > > etc/mail/aliases | 8 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2

Re: [PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On May 31, 2017 11:35:28 AM GMT+02:00, Consus wrote: >OpenBSD defaults to file table now so there is no need in running >newaliases(8). >--- > etc/mail/aliases | 8 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/etc/mail/aliases b/etc/mail/aliases >index

[PATCH] Do not mention newaliases(8) in /etc/mail/aliases

2017-05-31 Thread Consus
OpenBSD defaults to file table now so there is no need in running newaliases(8). --- etc/mail/aliases | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/etc/mail/aliases b/etc/mail/aliases index c1ac04b5a81..045b2b2a456 100644 --- a/etc/mail/aliases +++ b/etc/mail/aliases