On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:44:17PM +0200, Simon Mages wrote:
> Thats true, i found also another bug in this diff, the new one follows.
OK bluhm@
> Index: netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c,v
> re
2016-07-05 15:36 GMT+02:00, Claudio Jeker :
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 07:22:27AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
>> Makes sense to me. Others?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Simon Mages
>> wrote:
>> > At the moment the buffersize will be set to the default even if the
>> > current value
>> > is
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 07:22:27AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> Makes sense to me. Others?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Simon Mages
> wrote:
> > At the moment the buffersize will be set to the default even if the
> > current value
> > is smaller.
> >
> > The following diff fixes this prob
Makes sense to me. Others?
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Simon Mages wrote:
> At the moment the buffersize will be set to the default even if the
> current value
> is smaller.
>
> The following diff fixes this problem.
>
> Index: netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
>
At the moment the buffersize will be set to the default even if the
current value
is smaller.
The following diff fixes this problem.
Index: netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c,v
retrieving revision 1.