Sorry for delayed reply.
On Wed, 27 May 2020 01:29:36 +0300
Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> wrote:
>>> On 25 May 2020, at 22:04, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
>>> wrote:
For example, each pipex
> On 27 May 2020, at 01:29, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> wrote:
>>> On 25 May 2020, at 22:04, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
>>> wrote:
For example, each pipex session should have unique
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:12 AM Vitaliy Makkoveev
wrote:
> > On 27 May 2020, at 01:29, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> > wrote:
> >>> On 25 May 2020, at 22:04, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> >>>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
wrote:
>> On 25 May 2020, at 22:04, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
>> wrote:
>>> For example, each pipex session should have unique pair of `protocol’ and
>>> `session_id’. These values are passed
> On 25 May 2020, at 22:04, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>
> Hello Vitaliy,
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> wrote:
>>> On 23 May 2020, at 13:11, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:13 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
>>> wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at
Hello Vitaliy,
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:07 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
wrote:
> > On 23 May 2020, at 13:11, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:13 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:08:01AM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at
> On 23 May 2020, at 13:11, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:13 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:08:01AM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:11 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
>>> wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at
Hello,
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:13 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:08:01AM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:11 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:03:40PM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> > > > Split checks from
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:08:01AM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> 2 Hi Vitaliy,
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:11 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:03:40PM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> > > Split checks from frame accepting with header removing in the common
> > >
2 Hi Vitaliy,
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:11 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev
wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:03:40PM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> > Split checks from frame accepting with header removing in the common
> > PPP input function. This should fix packet capture on a PPP interfaces.
>
> Can
Hello Sergey.
I am not the developer, but I works in pipex(4) layer too. Also mpi@
wants I did rewiev for your diffs.
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:03:40PM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> Split checks from frame accepting with header removing in the common
> PPP input function. This should fix
Split checks from frame accepting with header removing in the common
PPP input function. This should fix packet capture on a PPP interfaces.
Also forbid IP/IPv6 frames (without PPP header) passing to BPF on
PPP interfaces to avoid mess.
Initialy this change was made as a part of pipex(4) and
12 matches
Mail list logo
