On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:52:39PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:44:02PM +0800, Nan Xiao wrote:
> > Use BUFSIZE instead of hard-code in netcat.c, FYI. Thanks!
>
> As this buffer is used with MSG_PEEK and its content is discarded,
> the size does not really matter.
Ouch! I misunderstood the patch by @bluhm, please ignore my
previous mail! I am very sorry for disrupting!
Best Regards
Nan Xiao
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Nan Xiao wrote:
> Actually, I think "plen = sizeof(buf);" may be better.
> Best Regards
> Nan Xiao
>
>
> On
Actually, I think "plen = sizeof(buf);" may be better.
Best Regards
Nan Xiao
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Alexander Bluhm
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:44:02PM +0800, Nan Xiao wrote:
>> Use BUFSIZE instead of hard-code in netcat.c, FYI. Thanks!
>
> As this
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:44:02PM +0800, Nan Xiao wrote:
> Use BUFSIZE instead of hard-code in netcat.c, FYI. Thanks!
As this buffer is used with MSG_PEEK and its content is discarded,
the size does not really matter. The complicated logic seems to
be a leftover from the -j jumbo option.
I
Hi tech@,
Use BUFSIZE instead of hard-code in netcat.c, FYI. Thanks!
Best Regards
Nan Xiao
Index: netcat.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/nc/netcat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.187
diff -u -p -r1.187 netcat.c
--- netcat.c15 Jul