Re: AMRR improvements for rt2860

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:24:15AM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote: > On 27 April 2016 at 17:33, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > This version includes minor tweak: When the AP goes down, we don't > > need to send disassoc frames to nodes in COLLECT state. > > While testing this diff

Re: AMRR improvements for rt2860

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 08:47:46AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 01:25:31PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote: > > The diff below also introduces dedicated timers for AMRR and for scan > > instead of using the RT2860 GP interrupt, which also improves consistency > > with the

Re: AMRR improvements for rt2860

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 01:25:31PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote: > I have been using an rt2860 hostap for a few years and I have discovered > that AMRR does not work properly for this driver. The symptom is that > some stations get stuck at 1 Mbps and do not progress up to faster rates. > >

AMRR improvements for rt2860

I have been using an rt2860 hostap for a few years and I have discovered that AMRR does not work properly for this driver. The symptom is that some stations get stuck at 1 Mbps and do not progress up to faster rates. Unlike many drivers, rt2860 does not keep the ieee80211_amrr_node on its