Re: Behavior of changing routes on OpenBSD 5.6

2014-12-09 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:13:11PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 04/12/14(Thu) 00:26, Alexander Bluhm wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:58:35PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: @@ -761,7 +754,17 @@ report: error = EDQUOT; goto flush;

Re: Behavior of changing routes on OpenBSD 5.6

2014-12-08 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 04/12/14(Thu) 00:26, Alexander Bluhm wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:58:35PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: @@ -761,7 +754,17 @@ report: error = EDQUOT; goto flush; } - ifa = info.rti_ifa;

Re: Behavior of changing routes on OpenBSD 5.6

2014-12-03 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:58:35PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: @@ -761,7 +754,17 @@ report: error = EDQUOT; goto flush; } - ifa = info.rti_ifa; + /* +

Re: Behavior of changing routes on OpenBSD 5.6

2014-11-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Hello Florian, On 26/11/14(Wed) 06:56, Florian Riehm wrote: since OpenBSD 5.6 route change messages can change the interface of a route (rt_ifa) even if a message doesn't seem to require it because of a changed gateway or stuff like that. I would like to ask if it's a regression or if the new

Behavior of changing routes on OpenBSD 5.6

2014-11-25 Thread Florian Riehm
Hi tech, since OpenBSD 5.6 route change messages can change the interface of a route (rt_ifa) even if a message doesn't seem to require it because of a changed gateway or stuff like that. I would like to ask if it's a regression or if the new behavior is intended. Example: (only for testing - it