On 09/12/15 09:13, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> First, some generals remarks:
>
> - The debug feature (not documented) defeat the `-r' flag purpose.
How do you mean it defeats it? The purpose of the '-r' flag is to stop
a user from creating and/or writing to files. Obviously said user may
not dictate
On 09/11/15 19:33, Sebastien Marie wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:03:54PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
Is *anyone* but me using rdump(8) + rmt(8)?
I use dump(8) for doing remote backup, but I don't use rmt(8), due to
plaintext storage on remote side.
I don't understand. What's
First, some generals remarks:
- The debug feature (not documented) defeat the `-r' flag purpose.
I think the code should be either:
- enclosed in #ifdef DEBUG (prefered way)
- not permitted if `rflag' or `wflag' are setted
- Adding tame(2) may be a good way to enforce the policyi, but
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:03:54PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Is *anyone* but me using rdump(8) + rmt(8)?
> >
> >I use dump(8) for doing remote backup, but I don't use rmt(8), due to
> >plaintext storage on remote side.
>
> I don't understand. What's "plaintext storage"? :-)
>
On September 11, 2015 6:27:26 AM GMT+02:00, Sebastien Marie
wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:58:52AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
>> I'm going wide with this diff I've been pushing for quite some time
>now.
>>
>> Is *anyone* but me using rdump(8) + rmt(8)?
>
>I use
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:58:52AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> I'm going wide with this diff I've been pushing for quite some time now.
>
> Is *anyone* but me using rdump(8) + rmt(8)?
I use dump(8) for doing remote backup, but I don't use rmt(8), due to
plaintext storage on remote side.
>
I'm going wide with this diff I've been pushing for quite some time now.
Is *anyone* but me using rdump(8) + rmt(8)?
*If you are currently using rdump/rrestore + rmt, I urge you to test
this diff to make sure it causes no regression. It shouldn't, but
you've been warned.
So, anyway, this diff