> > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:11:58 +0100
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > On 12/11/16(Sat) 15:52, patrick keshishian wrote:
> > > Ahh... seems the culprit is softclock_thread added 2016/09/22
> > > (kern/kern_timeout.c mpi@).
> >
> > I'd suggest we simply skip kernel thread
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:11:58 +0100
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 12/11/16(Sat) 15:52, patrick keshishian wrote:
> > Ahh... seems the culprit is softclock_thread added 2016/09/22
> > (kern/kern_timeout.c mpi@).
>
> I'd suggest we simply skip kernel thread when calculating
On 12/11/16(Sat) 15:52, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Ahh... seems the culprit is softclock_thread added 2016/09/22
> (kern/kern_timeout.c mpi@).
I'd suggest we simply skip kernel thread when calculating the load.
Since we're slowly moving code executed in software interrupt
context to kernel