Here is the last patch. It does not differ from last time.
You only need to install sysutils/sshfs and if you have done all the last
tasks well. it will works like that :
root # sshfs user@domainname:/path/to/file /mnt/
Cheers,
Index: sysutils/Makefile
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 17:14, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
You will find in this mail a patch for fuse support in kernel. I will send 2
other mails for the userland and the ports patch. There is still work to do
on my fuse implementation but as I understand there is an hackathon occuring
at the
Hi,
[...]
I will spend the next days working on the NetBSD librefuse, I will try
to get it working with my kernel code and will come back here when I
have something that works.
[...]
Are there any news on this? If you need a hand testing stuff and
tracking down bugs, I'd be very happy to
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Gregor Best g...@ring0.de wrote:
Hi,
[...]
I will spend the next days working on the NetBSD librefuse, I will try
to get it working with my kernel code and will come back here when I
have something that works.
[...]
Are there any news on this? If you need
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
I am not quite sure but I think that only libfuse and sshfs are GPL
licenced. The patches for those two items are only present in ports.
All the code present in src is ISC licenced. The kernel communicate with
libfuse
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:10:48PM +0100, Jonathan Armani wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
I am not quite sure but I think that only libfuse and sshfs are GPL
licenced. The patches for those two items are only present in ports.
All the code
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:10:48PM +0100, Jonathan Armani wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
I am not quite sure but I think that only libfuse and sshfs are GPL
licenced. The
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Bob Beck b...@obtuse.com wrote:
Which is why I keep pointing people at puffs and librefuse in netbsd
Hi,
Using puffs will induce a rewrite of all the kernel code, because the
internals are completely different (and I think a little bit more
complex,
Using puffs will induce a rewrite of all the kernel code, because the
internals are completely different (and I think a little bit more
complex, but this is a personal opinion...).
I might share that opinon :)
For a libfuse support in basesystem we will need to do a librefuse
like
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 22:27, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
Do you know if miscfs is the best place to put my code ?
I think so.
Do I keep the device code (fuse_device.c) in the same directory than the
filesystem code?
I'd prefer that. sys/dev is kind of cluttered as it is, and since the
dev
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
filesystem and OpenBSD. After some time working on this subject I have
succeeded to create something that works. It is not even near to be perfect
but with some changes and adaptions I think it could do the job.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
filesystem and OpenBSD. After some time working on this subject I have
succeeded to create something that works. It is not even near to be
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:49:20PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
filesystem and OpenBSD. After some time working on this subject I have
Sylvestre, one of the problems with fuse itself is that it's GPL
licensed, and not appropriate
for inclusion in base. If you've got interets and talent in this area,
you might want to consider
having a peek at puffs (and refuse) from netbsd which has a workable
license and could
be included in
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:11:41PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:49:20PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
On 05/03/13(Tue) 06:44, Bob Beck wrote:
Sylvestre, one of the problems with fuse itself is that it's GPL
licensed, and not appropriate for inclusion in base. If you've got
interets and talent in this area, you might want to consider
having a peek at puffs (and refuse) from netbsd which has a
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Bob Beck b...@openbsd.org wrote:
Sylvestre, one of the problems with fuse itself is that it's GPL
licensed, and not appropriate
for inclusion in base. If you've got interets and talent in this area,
you might want to consider
having a peek at puffs (and
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Sylvestre Gallon ccna@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
You will find inline the kernel patch
And here the userland :
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.97
18 matches
Mail list logo
