kili@ just committed a revert of the librt addition in src and corresponding
patches in ports.
If you've built a tree with librt, you want to
# rm -f /usr/lib/librt.a
This lib was added to facilitate porting software, as posix asks for it.
but since it's only a stub, it was only added as a
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
kili@ just committed a revert of the librt addition in src and corresponding
patches in ports.
If you've built a tree with librt, you want to
# rm -f /usr/lib/librt.a
This lib was added to facilitate porting software, as
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Loganaden Velvindron
logana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
kili@ just committed a revert of the librt addition in src and corresponding
patches in ports.
If you've built a tree with librt, you want to
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:46:08PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
kili@ just committed a revert of the librt addition in src and
corresponding
patches in ports.
If you've built a tree with librt, you want to
#
On 03/23/14 14:34, Marc Espie wrote:
kili@ just committed a revert of the librt addition in src and corresponding
patches in ports.
If you've built a tree with librt, you want to
# rm -f /usr/lib/librt.a
Shouldn't that be librt*a to get rid of librt_p.a too?
--STeve Andre'
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:05:06PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
On 03/23/14 14:34, Marc Espie wrote:
kili@ just committed a revert of the librt addition in src and corresponding
patches in ports.
If you've built a tree with librt, you want to
# rm -f /usr/lib/librt.a
Shouldn't that be
