Re: MAKE: redux patch

2020-01-12 Thread Todd C . Miller
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:34:23 +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > Oh, the test is wrong, and it's now enough to have make complain about it. > > Before the patch, errors in .END and .BEGIN were not properly looked at. > > See, that -f ... && will be *false* if the file doesn't exist. > The way to this

Re: MAKE: redux patch

2020-01-11 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:52:03PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 01:58:47PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > Bleh, I forgot to synch two patches I already committed. Here's a patch > > that applies cleanly. > > I did run this make through a full regress. It seems that make

Re: MAKE: redux patch

2020-01-10 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 01:58:47PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > Bleh, I forgot to synch two patches I already committed. Here's a patch > that applies cleanly. I did run this make through a full regress. It seems that make regress in /usr/src/regress/usr.sbin/ldapd/ exits with an error.

Re: MAKE: redux patch

2020-01-10 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:09:59PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > So my development branch is getting a bit too far > ahead compared to what's committed. > > Here's a big diff to test. Comments as to what's going on > and the changes this contains: > > - buffer changes: add support for "permanent

MAKE: redux patch

2020-01-09 Thread Marc Espie
So my development branch is getting a bit too far ahead compared to what's committed. Here's a big diff to test. Comments as to what's going on and the changes this contains: - buffer changes: add support for "permanent static buffers" that don't get reinit'd all the time (that's a mostly