On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 07:44:03PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:01:51 +0200
> > From: Alexander Bluhm
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:39:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Since the tests succeed on amd64, and should succeed on other
>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:01:51 +0200
> From: Alexander Bluhm
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:39:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Since the tests succeed on amd64, and should succeed on other
> > architectures, the diff re-enables this test.
>
> When running with
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:39:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Since the tests succeed on amd64, and should succeed on other
> architectures, the diff re-enables this test.
When running with "make regress" the test fails as the regress
target does not build the libraries.
Usually I add an
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:00:55AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:54:46 +0200
> > From: Alexander Bluhm
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:39:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Diff below modernizes the C++ code a bit such that the test
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:54:46 +0200
> From: Alexander Bluhm
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:39:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Diff below modernizes the C++ code a bit such that the test case
> > compiles again without warnings. It also uses CPPFLAGS instead of
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:39:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Diff below modernizes the C++ code a bit such that the test case
> compiles again without warnings. It also uses CPPFLAGS instead of
> CFLAGS such that the c++ compiler actually stands a chance finding the
> header files.
>
> Since
Diff below modernizes the C++ code a bit such that the test case
compiles again without warnings. It also uses CPPFLAGS instead of
CFLAGS such that the c++ compiler actually stands a chance finding the
header files.
Since the tests succeed on amd64, and should succeed on other
architectures, the