Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 02:29:49 -0500
From: Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared)
semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim
that we
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:42, Mark Kettenis wrote:
As Ted pointed out, the size of the struct (or union) becomes part of
the ABI. So we should probably reserve a bit more space than we
actually need for the implementation. That way, we'll leave some room
for experimentation. Wasting a bit
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared)
semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim
that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to implement it, too.
Haven't forgotten about
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:12, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
If we go back to returning ENOMEM or whatever in sem_init, does that
fix KDE?
If we stop pretending we support shared unnamed semaphores, then, yes,
this will help KDE. But I cannot gurantee there will be no other
fallout. This needs a deep
2013/12/9 Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 19:49, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
So what's the decision?
Are there any objections still? If not, can I have a pair of okays?
KDE4 really needs a decision to be made: people already had apps
crashing without this diff, so I've put a
2013/12/8 Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
One of the hallmarks of the original libpthread was that all data
structures were opaque, and hidden via pointers. That in turn made it
possible to write a binary compatible
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 19:49, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
So what's the decision?
Are there any objections still? If not, can I have a pair of okays?
KDE4 really needs a decision to be made: people already had apps
crashing without this diff, so I've put a dirty hack to stop KDE using
of
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared)
semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim
that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to implement it, too.
This changes the sem_t definition: it becomes a synonim to struct __sem
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared)
semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim
that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to implement it, too.
This changes the
2013/12/7 Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared)
semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim
that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 21:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
2013/12/7 Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared)
semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim
07.12.2013 22:35 пользователь Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com написал:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 21:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
2013/12/7 Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing
(process-shared)
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
One of the hallmarks of the original libpthread was that all data
structures were opaque, and hidden via pointers. That in turn made it
possible to write a binary compatible librthread. I never would have
started
13 matches
Mail list logo
