On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:34:00PM -0400, Todd Mortimer wrote:
> > 2. This patch also hits NOP sleds > 8 bytes on i386. We could also hit
> > the NOP sleds between 3 and 7 bytes if there are no objections.
>
> The attached diff implements the same trapsled mechanism for i386 and
> amd64 for all
> 2. This patch also hits NOP sleds > 8 bytes on i386. We could also hit
> the NOP sleds between 3 and 7 bytes if there are no objections.
The attached diff implements the same trapsled mechanism for i386 and
amd64 for all padding sequences between 3 and 15 bytes.
I have put this through a
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:22:57PM -0400, Todd Mortimer wrote:
> Hello tech,
>
> I have attached a patch that converts NOP padding from the assembler
> into INT3 padding on amd64. The idea is to remove potentially conveinent
> NOP sleds from programs and libraries, which makes it harder for an
>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:22:57PM -0400, Todd Mortimer wrote:
> Hello tech,
>
> I have attached a patch that converts NOP padding from the assembler
> into INT3 padding on amd64. The idea is to remove potentially conveinent
> NOP sleds from programs and libraries, which makes it harder for an
>
