On 15/11/13(Fri) 15:45, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:20:48PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 15 November 2013 15:13, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
Is this done right?
Works here with pppoe(4) for both IPv4 and IPv6.
i think this diff might lack
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:37:53PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Even if right now calling task_del() is enough, do you know if there's
an easy way to convert this code without putting the task storage in
the chunk of memory it manipulates? In other words having the struct
task outside of the
On 18/11/13(Mon) 13:35, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:37:53PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Even if right now calling task_del() is enough, do you know if there's
an easy way to convert this code without putting the task storage in
the chunk of memory it manipulates? In
On 15 November 2013 15:13, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
Is this done right?
Works here with pppoe(4) for both IPv4 and IPv6.
i think this diff might lack task_del's in the detach code.
have you tried destroying your pppoe interface?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:20:48PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 15 November 2013 15:13, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
Is this done right?
Works here with pppoe(4) for both IPv4 and IPv6.
i think this diff might lack task_del's in the detach code.
Ooops, good catch.
have
On 15 November 2013 15:45, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:20:48PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 15 November 2013 15:13, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
Is this done right?
Works here with pppoe(4) for both IPv4 and IPv6.
i think this diff
