Current tests goes fine, and actually show some existing problems because
the old infrastructure is:
- too complicated
- bsd.port.mk lies about what's going on.
Namely, libspecs were apparently tied to the pkgspec in a LIB_DEPENDS.
But that's not true ! bsd.port.mk was only using those specs as
The following patch changes the semantics of LIB_DEPENDS/WANTLIB, hopefully
to make things simpler for ports maintenance.
Historically, all libs were registered in LIB_DEPENDS. In order to handle
updates, packages had to register all needed libraries.
The current mechanism is that a package
Faster patch... this removes a lot of old cruft, and yields a
_print-package-args that's about twice as fast, instead of potentially slower.
Specifically, always grab lib lists off the ports tree proper, evaluate them
once, and use the fact that resolve-lib has known how to handle multiple
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:33:43PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
Faster patch... this removes a lot of old cruft, and yields a
_print-package-args that's about twice as fast, instead of potentially
slower.
Turns out it must be slightly more complicated.
Namely, we have to bring LIB_DEPENDS
Hopefully final patch... moving this up from make to sh means I must escape
a bit more stuff...
Index: bsd.port.mk
===
RCS file: /home/openbsd/cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.1007
diff -u -p -r1.1007
On 2010/07/02 23:32, Marc Espie wrote:
Hopefully final patch... moving this up from make to sh means I must escape
a bit more stuff...
people who are confused might find this easier to understand with
an example: the diff below results in no packing list change, it's
equivalent to what is there
