Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/11/14 10:26, Solene Rapenne wrote: > any other people noticed a difference with the priority change? Can't tell if it has affected bulk builds, between bugs being committed and some changes to ports/packages that would affect build times it's hard to say. Maybe when the dust has settled

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-14 Thread Solene Rapenne
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 02:35:28PM +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 01:18:53PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2019/11/01 19:16, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > > > > > > Theo de

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-06 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 02:35:28PM +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 01:18:53PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/11/01 19:16, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > > > > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > > What about all the other users who aren't in

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-02 Thread Solene Rapenne
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 01:18:53PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/11/01 19:16, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > What about all the other users who aren't in staff? > > > > > > > > I think the approach is right. Push non-interactive

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/11/01 19:16, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > What about all the other users who aren't in staff? > > > > > > I think the approach is right. Push non-interactive down. > > > > The same then for src build user? > > Well, that's different.

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-01 Thread Theo de Raadt
Ted Unangst wrote: > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > What about all the other users who aren't in staff? > > > > I think the approach is right. Push non-interactive down. > > The same then for src build user? Well, that's different. Most of us building the src tree are waiting eagerly for it to

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-01 Thread Ted Unangst
Theo de Raadt wrote: > What about all the other users who aren't in staff? > > I think the approach is right. Push non-interactive down. The same then for src build user?

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-01 Thread Theo de Raadt
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/11/01 23:32, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:06:48PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > On 2019-10-31, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > > > > > > I suggest adding a priority=5 to _pbuild user. > > > > > > Is this the right place? Or

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/11/01 23:32, Solene Rapenne wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:06:48PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > On 2019-10-31, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > > > > I suggest adding a priority=5 to _pbuild user. > > > > Is this the right place? Or should dpb do this? > > > > -- > >

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-01 Thread Solene Rapenne
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:06:48PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2019-10-31, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > > I suggest adding a priority=5 to _pbuild user. > > Is this the right place? Or should dpb do this? > > -- > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber

Re: _pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-11-01 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2019-10-31, Solene Rapenne wrote: > I suggest adding a priority=5 to _pbuild user. Is this the right place? Or should dpb do this? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

_pbuild user to have priority=5

2019-10-31 Thread Solene Rapenne
I suggest adding a priority=5 to _pbuild user. I tried on a macppc, a core 2 duo laptop and i7 laptop. It helped a lot the macppc and core2 to stay responsive on ssh or being barely usable while building. On the i7, the benefits are less. At best this allows firefox to stay responsive on bloated