Re: backport from clang trunk

2017-06-02 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:18:06PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > I managed to get this one in. > > the rationale being that -Wno-#warnings, while highly descriptive, is a total > bitch to pass through shell-scripts, configure, makefiles... and gcc names > the same option -Wno-cpp anyway. > > >

Re: backport from clang trunk

2017-06-02 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:18:06 +0200 > From: Marc Espie > > I managed to get this one in. > > the rationale being that -Wno-#warnings, while highly descriptive, is a total > bitch to pass through shell-scripts, configure, makefiles... and gcc names > the same option -Wno-cpp

backport from clang trunk

2017-06-02 Thread Marc Espie
I managed to get this one in. the rationale being that -Wno-#warnings, while highly descriptive, is a total bitch to pass through shell-scripts, configure, makefiles... and gcc names the same option -Wno-cpp anyway. okay ? Index: DiagnosticGroups.td