On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:18:06PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I managed to get this one in.
>
> the rationale being that -Wno-#warnings, while highly descriptive, is a total
> bitch to pass through shell-scripts, configure, makefiles... and gcc names
> the same option -Wno-cpp anyway.
>
>
>
> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:18:06 +0200
> From: Marc Espie
>
> I managed to get this one in.
>
> the rationale being that -Wno-#warnings, while highly descriptive, is a total
> bitch to pass through shell-scripts, configure, makefiles... and gcc names
> the same option -Wno-cpp
I managed to get this one in.
the rationale being that -Wno-#warnings, while highly descriptive, is a total
bitch to pass through shell-scripts, configure, makefiles... and gcc names
the same option -Wno-cpp anyway.
okay ?
Index: DiagnosticGroups.td