* Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org [2013-09-02 12:12]:
On 30/08/13(Fri) 21:50, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
Hi,
The file netinet/in_var.h includes netinet6/in6_var.h. This creates
a bunch of useless dependencies. For an upcomming change in in6_var.h
I would like to split that up.
On 30/08/13(Fri) 21:50, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
Hi,
The file netinet/in_var.h includes netinet6/in6_var.h. This creates
a bunch of useless dependencies. For an upcomming change in in6_var.h
I would like to split that up.
Is this a good idea? comments/ok?
I like the idea but we should be
Hi,
The file netinet/in_var.h includes netinet6/in6_var.h. This creates
a bunch of useless dependencies. For an upcomming change in in6_var.h
I would like to split that up.
Is this a good idea? comments/ok?
Note that netinet/in.h includes netinet6/in6.h, but that is required
by RFC.
The