Re: in_var.h incudes in6_var.h

2013-09-05 Thread Henning Brauer
* Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org [2013-09-02 12:12]: On 30/08/13(Fri) 21:50, Alexander Bluhm wrote: Hi, The file netinet/in_var.h includes netinet6/in6_var.h. This creates a bunch of useless dependencies. For an upcomming change in in6_var.h I would like to split that up.

Re: in_var.h incudes in6_var.h

2013-09-02 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 30/08/13(Fri) 21:50, Alexander Bluhm wrote: Hi, The file netinet/in_var.h includes netinet6/in6_var.h. This creates a bunch of useless dependencies. For an upcomming change in in6_var.h I would like to split that up. Is this a good idea? comments/ok? I like the idea but we should be

in_var.h incudes in6_var.h

2013-08-30 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi, The file netinet/in_var.h includes netinet6/in6_var.h. This creates a bunch of useless dependencies. For an upcomming change in in6_var.h I would like to split that up. Is this a good idea? comments/ok? Note that netinet/in.h includes netinet6/in6.h, but that is required by RFC. The