On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Noth wrote:
> Now testing with a July 17th kernel, everything works fine at .11n speeds
> but the ping goes from 1ms to 100+ms for one packet on average every 50-60
> packets.
Can you pin-point the iwm commit which changed this?
Now testing with a July 17th kernel, everything works fine at .11n
speeds but the ping goes from 1ms to 100+ms for one packet on average
every 50-60 packets.
64 bytes from 192.168.50.1: icmp_seq=499 ttl=255 time=1.158 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.50.1: icmp_seq=500 ttl=255 time=0.832 ms
64 bytes
This is with mode 11g added to /etc/hostname.iwm0 :
# ifconfig iwm0 scan
iwm0: flags=208843 mtu
1500
lladdr 5c:51:4f:43:b5:c0
index 1 priority 4 llprio 3
groups: wlan egress
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (OFDM54
Can you add the line "mode 11g" to your hostname.iwm0 file, reboot the
computer and run the same tests again?
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 03:20:18PM +0200, Noth wrote:
> Here's some more info:
>
> iwm0 is an intel 7260.
>
> scan test:
>
> # ifconfig iwm0 scan
> iwm0:
Here's some more info:
iwm0 is an intel 7260.
scan test:
# ifconfig iwm0 scan
iwm0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
lladdr 5c:51:4f:43:b5:c0
index 1 priority 4 llprio 3
groups: wlan
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (autoselect mode 11b)
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Noth wrote:
> I see there's been quite a few changes to iwm, but unfortunately on the
> latest snapshot (July 26th) the performance is abysmal: what used to be
> decently fast works at between 0.5 & 2kb/s. Ping rates go from 10ms to
>
> Hi tech@
>
>
>I see there's been quite a few changes to iwm, but unfortunately on
> the latest snapshot (July 26th) the performance is abysmal: what used to
> be decently fast works at between 0.5 & 2kb/s. Ping rates go from 10ms
> to 1000ms and back again over a few packets, with some
Hi tech@
I see there's been quite a few changes to iwm, but unfortunately on
the latest snapshot (July 26th) the performance is abysmal: what used to
be decently fast works at between 0.5 & 2kb/s. Ping rates go from 10ms
to 1000ms and back again over a few packets, with some packets lost.