On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 12:00:44AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:29:11PM +, Koakuma wrote:
> > I noticed that when using `ldomctl status` the utilization value of
> > stopped ldoms is always a copy of the previous entry's value,
> > which is probably incorrect?
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:29:11PM +, Koakuma wrote:
> I noticed that when using `ldomctl status` the utilization value of
> stopped ldoms is always a copy of the previous entry's value,
> which is probably incorrect?
>
> Zeroing utilization value in `ldomctl status` at the start of the loop
I noticed that when using `ldomctl status` the utilization value of
stopped ldoms is always a copy of the previous entry's value,
which is probably incorrect?
Zeroing utilization value in `ldomctl status` at the start of the loop
makes it so that stopped ldoms' utilization appear as a zero, which
