On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
> workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
> think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
&g
On 2017/10/06 13:51, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
> > workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
> > think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
> > workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
> > think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
> > processes.
> >
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
> workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
> think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
> processes.
>
> It seems that perhaps t
I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
processes.
It seems that perhaps threads are counted towards these. Is that
expected/desirable
