On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 04:43:06PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Would like to commit this so I can move on.
Just some remarks about variable naming. But please commit as it
is, cleanup on uncommited diffs is difficult.
> -struct pfkeyv2_socket {
> - LIST_ENTRY(pfkeyv2_socket)
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 01:59:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This is a step I need to do to make progress on the PF_KEY cleanup I'm
> doing. Both PF_ROUTE and PF_KEY need to start to take care of their own
> PCB list and so move the LIST_ENTRY out of rawcb into routecb.
> This allows me to do
On 05/06/17(Mon) 17:32, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 30/05/17(Tue) 13:59, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > - struct rawcb*rp;
> > > struct routecb *rop;
> > > int af;
> > > int error = 0;
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 30/05/17(Tue) 13:59, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This is a step I need to do to make progress on the PF_KEY cleanup I'm
> > doing. Both PF_ROUTE and PF_KEY need to start to take care of their own
> > PCB list and so move the
On 30/05/17(Tue) 13:59, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This is a step I need to do to make progress on the PF_KEY cleanup I'm
> doing. Both PF_ROUTE and PF_KEY need to start to take care of their own
> PCB list and so move the LIST_ENTRY out of rawcb into routecb.
> This allows me to do the same in PF_KEY
This is a step I need to do to make progress on the PF_KEY cleanup I'm
doing. Both PF_ROUTE and PF_KEY need to start to take care of their own
PCB list and so move the LIST_ENTRY out of rawcb into routecb.
This allows me to do the same in PF_KEY which will be sent as the next
diff.
--
:wq
