Thanks for your review.
On 12/09/15(Sat) 15:30, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> [...]
> Do you think it is a good idea to reuse the rt parameter in this
> goto spaghetti mess? I looks correct, but I would keep a local
> variable for this local route usage.
Fine, I kept a local variable.
> The
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:57:23PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Did I miss something else?
I did not find anything. OK bluhm@
> @@ -1536,15 +1541,18 @@ struct nd_pfxrouter *
> find_pfxlist_reachable_router(struct nd_prefix *pr)
> {
> struct nd_pfxrouter *pfxrtr;
> - struct
This diff removes a tricky "rt->rt_refcnt--". It changes the behavior
of nd6_lookup() to always return a route entry with a valid reference
count. That means that rtfree(9) should be called after nd6_lookup().
There's on hairy case in nd6_output(). This is because of the dance
done in
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:17:54AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I'd like to have careful reviews. I'm running with this for a couple
> of months but I doubt I'm exercising all the code paths.
> @@ -1677,24 +1677,21 @@ icmp6_redirect_output(struct mbuf *m0, s
>
> {
> /*
