On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 06:44:19AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
>
> I will play around with this and see what I can come up with, thanks!
>
For any interested parties there is now support for the pkg_add
branch-syntax in the openbsd_pkg package management module in ansible
upstream:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 06:44:19AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 02:19:26PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > > The reason for doing this is that it is much faster than just blindly
> > > trying to install a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 02:19:26PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > The reason for doing this is that it is much faster than just blindly
> > trying to install a package, and does not hammer mirrors needlessly.
> >
> > Are there any
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> The reason for doing this is that it is much faster than just blindly
> trying to install a package, and does not hammer mirrors needlessly.
>
> Are there any plans to teach pkg_info -e about "%"? Is it even possible?
Okay, just
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> However, "pkg_info -e" does not understand it:
> ===
> # pkg_info -e python%2.7
> Invalid spec: python%2.7
> ===
>
> I use pkg_info -e to check if a requested package is installed or
> not prior to attempting to install/remove it.
>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:02:36PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I was waiting for snapshots to come up with the new stuff, but it
> looks like amd64 will be a bit late. Someone is still hiking in
> the mountains...
>
>
> A week ago or so, I committed support for some disambiguating
> filter in
On 2016/06/18 19:54, frantisek holop wrote:
> does this deprecate -z ?
hopefully not; -z is useful for feeding old pkg_info output into pkg_add
on a new machine, and we've used it in the past for getting past a flag
day bump.
amd64 snapshots have been flowing again since yesterday. apologies for
the delay.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> I was waiting for snapshots to come up with the new stuff, but it
> looks like amd64 will be a bit late. Someone is still hiking in
> the
does this deprecate -z ?
-f
--
there's no second chance for a good first impression.
I was waiting for snapshots to come up with the new stuff, but it
looks like amd64 will be a bit late. Someone is still hiking in
the mountains...
A week ago or so, I committed support for some disambiguating
filter in pkg_add.
This means that you can now simply install packages for ports
10 matches
Mail list logo