On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 05:06:30PM +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/04/2020 12:47, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > +.Xr pppax 4 ,
>
> I guess you meant pppac here.
>
> Thanks,
> Iain.
>
Thanks!
Index: share/man/man4/pipex.4
Hi,
On 02/04/2020 12:47, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> +.Xr pppax 4 ,
I guess you meant pppac here.
Thanks,
Iain.
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 09:07:23AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 29/03/20(Sun) 00:16, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > pipex not used with tun(4)
>
> It seems an oversight from the addition of the new pppac(4) driver. See
> net/if_tun.c commits from January this year.
>
> So the right fix
On 29/03/20(Sun) 00:16, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> pipex not used with tun(4)
It seems an oversight from the addition of the new pppac(4) driver. See
net/if_tun.c commits from January this year.
So the right fix would be to replace tun(4) with pppac(4) and add a pppac.4
manpage. Do you feel
pipex not used with tun(4)
Index: share/man/man4/pipex.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/pipex.4,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 pipex.4
--- share/man/man4/pipex.4 18 Apr 2017 03:21:48 - 1.11
+++