On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 08:08:48AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> I guess the overall question is if an IPv4 packet size is a hop by hop
> thing, or whether the endpoints should have final say about what they're
> prepared to deal with.
You are moving the layer 2 MTU size configuration to the
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 09:34:19PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This looks like a hack for a problem that should not exist.
I should unconditionally refragment reassembled packets?
> What is the MTU of the outgoing interface on your pf router? If
> the layer 2 switches do not
Hi,
This looks like a hack for a problem that should not exist.
What is the MTU of the outgoing interface on your pf router? If
the layer 2 switches do not support 9k jumbo frames, it must be
1500.
Why are the outgoing packets not fragmented to the MTU? Is the
dont-fragment flag set? Does pf
i am in an annoying situation where i peer with a campus network on an
ospf link with a 9k mtu, but some corners of that network have layer 2
hops that don't support 9k packets. i sometimes want to tunnel large
(1500 byte) packets to hosts in those corners of the network by
letting the
