On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:48:14AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/05/20(Thu) 14:59, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > socket(2) layer is already protected by solock(). It grabs NET_LOCK()
> > for inet{,6}(4) sockets, but all other sockets are still under
> > KERNEL_LOCK().
> >
> > I guess
On 28/05/20(Thu) 14:59, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> socket(2) layer is already protected by solock(). It grabs NET_LOCK()
> for inet{,6}(4) sockets, but all other sockets are still under
> KERNEL_LOCK().
>
> I guess solock is already placed everythere it's required. Also `struct
> file' is already
socket(2) layer is already protected by solock(). It grabs NET_LOCK()
for inet{,6}(4) sockets, but all other sockets are still under
KERNEL_LOCK().
I guess solock is already placed everythere it's required. Also `struct
file' is already mp-safe.
Diff below introduces rwlock `unp_lock'. It's
