Re: update comment about p_usrpri

2016-03-09 Thread Michal Mazurek
On 09:42:32, 9.03.16, Michal Mazurek wrote: > On 22:47:08, 8.03.16, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 08/03/16(Tue) 10:01, Michal Mazurek wrote: > > > p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it. > > > > Michal I lost track of all your comment fixes. One of the accepted > > rules when we read

Re: update comment about p_usrpri

2016-03-09 Thread Michal Mazurek
On 22:47:08, 8.03.16, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 08/03/16(Tue) 10:01, Michal Mazurek wrote: > > p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it. > > Michal I lost track of all your comment fixes. One of the accepted > rules when we read code is that comments are always lying. So I doubt > anyone

Re: update comment about p_usrpri

2016-03-08 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 08/03/16(Tue) 10:01, Michal Mazurek wrote: > p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it. Michal I lost track of all your comment fixes. One of the accepted rules when we read code is that comments are always lying. So I doubt anyone will object fixing them. Could you send a single diff

update comment about p_usrpri

2016-03-08 Thread Michal Mazurek
p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it. Index: sys/sys/proc.h === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/proc.h,v retrieving revision 1.216 diff -u -p -r1.216 proc.h --- sys/sys/proc.h 6 Mar 2016 05:20:26 - 1.216 +++