On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:34:59AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 09:42:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Recent Oracle SPARC machines have a USB gadget to talk to the Service
> > Processor (ILOM). This gadget supports both RNDIS and CDC Ethernet.
> > The RNDIS bits
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 09:42:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Recent Oracle SPARC machines have a USB gadget to talk to the Service
> Processor (ILOM). This gadget supports both RNDIS and CDC Ethernet.
> The RNDIS bits uncovered a bug in urndis(4). When urndis_ctrl_set()
> sets up the
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 09:42:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Recent Oracle SPARC machines have a USB gadget to talk to the Service
Processor (ILOM). This gadget supports both RNDIS and CDC Ethernet.
The RNDIS bits uncovered a bug in urndis(4). When urndis_ctrl_set()
sets up the
Recent Oracle SPARC machines have a USB gadget to talk to the Service
Processor (ILOM). This gadget supports both RNDIS and CDC Ethernet.
The RNDIS bits uncovered a bug in urndis(4). When urndis_ctrl_set()
sets up the REMOTE_NDIS_SET_MSG command it sets up msg-rm_infobuflen,
it subsequently
Could people doing actual networking with urndis(4) please test the
following diff and report if any regressions are encountered?
I plan on commiting it by the end of the week if I don't hear anything
bad in regards to the patch.
Index: if_urndis.c
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:47:30AM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Could people doing actual networking with urndis(4) please test the
following diff and report if any regressions are encountered?
I plan on commiting it by the end of the week if I don't hear anything
bad in regards to the patch.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:07:17AM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:47:30AM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Could people doing actual networking with urndis(4) please test the
following diff and report if any regressions are encountered?
I plan on commiting it by the end of
