> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:37:40 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 22/09/20(Tue) 10:20, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:15:00 +0200
> > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > >
> > > Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c
> > > and uvm_fault.c.
>
On 22/09/20(Tue) 10:20, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:15:00 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c
> > and uvm_fault.c.
> >
> > ok?
>
> In general, yes. This might interfere with the diff that
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:15:00 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c
> and uvm_fault.c.
>
> ok?
In general, yes. This might interfere with the diff that guenther@
did a while ago to lock amaps and unlock more of uvm. Now
ok mvs
> On 22 Sep 2020, at 10:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c
> and uvm_fault.c.
>
> ok?
>
> Index: uvm/uvm_addr.c
> ===
> RCS file:
Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c
and uvm_fault.c.
ok?
Index: uvm/uvm_addr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_addr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -p -r1.28 uvm_addr.c
--- uvm/uvm_addr.c