Re: uvm: __inline -> inline

2020-09-22 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:37:40 +0200 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > On 22/09/20(Tue) 10:20, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:15:00 +0200 > > > From: Martin Pieuchot > > > > > > Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c > > > and uvm_fault.c. >

Re: uvm: __inline -> inline

2020-09-22 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 22/09/20(Tue) 10:20, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:15:00 +0200 > > From: Martin Pieuchot > > > > Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c > > and uvm_fault.c. > > > > ok? > > In general, yes. This might interfere with the diff that

Re: uvm: __inline -> inline

2020-09-22 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:15:00 +0200 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c > and uvm_fault.c. > > ok? In general, yes. This might interfere with the diff that guenther@ did a while ago to lock amaps and unlock more of uvm. Now

Re: uvm: __inline -> inline

2020-09-22 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
ok mvs > On 22 Sep 2020, at 10:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c > and uvm_fault.c. > > ok? > > Index: uvm/uvm_addr.c > === > RCS file:

uvm: __inline -> inline

2020-09-22 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Spell inline correctly, also reduce the diff with NetBSD for uvm_amap.c and uvm_fault.c. ok? Index: uvm/uvm_addr.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_addr.c,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -p -r1.28 uvm_addr.c --- uvm/uvm_addr.c