On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
From: David Gwynne l...@animata.net
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:04:27 +1000
you dawe,
you could point both chips at the same function...
Which shows how badly the chosen name for that function really is.
I did
On 2011-06-24 01.39, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
developer interest and active development.
Never used ccd(4) so can't comment on that, but RAIDframe (raid(4)) has
a
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
How about this now?
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:05:04AM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
These functions used to be big and complicated, now they are glorified
wrappers around pmemrange and don't really need their own file.
From: Jonathan Matthew
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:49:50 +1000
Which shows how badly the chosen name for that function really is.
I did some digging into the issue. If you look at 3400 docs, you'll
see that description of the AHCI_REG_CAP registers says that the BIOS
should set the
If you have problems viewing this message,View the Web or Mobile Version
https://www.magnetmail.net/actions/email_web_version.cfm?recipient_id=7382285
72message_id=1413942user_id=LEBHAR_CVERSION=TEXTgroup_id=658916jobid=586
6550
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:08:47PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
Hi,
I prepared update package xkeyboard-config to the latest release 2.3.
Patch available on http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/xkeyboard-config-2.3.diff
Tested on amd64.
--
Alexandr Shadchin
No problems here on amd64 with
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
From: Jonathan Matthew
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:49:50 +1000
Which shows how badly the chosen name for that function really is.
I did some digging into the issue. If you look at 3400 docs, you'll
see that
On Friday 24 June 2011, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
I use neither but know people claim to be using one or the other,
but mostly raid(4), a.k.a. raidframe.
Then it sounds like the solution is to subtly break
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
Diff below fixes ldd /usr/lib/*.so.* so that it outputs more than
just the first shared object's dependencies, like the behavior from
ldd /usr/bin/*.
The issue is that dlopen(f, RTLD_TRACE) calls exit() after it's
Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
developer interest and active development.
Is softraid ready at all? I thought it was experimental, under
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:38:48PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
developer interest and active development.
i know you will love this =))
www.elitewealthsecret.com
thank me later
blessings,
Mike
On 06/22/2011 03:15 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:43:27AM +, Thomas Gerlach wrote:
...crap! sorry, something went wrong here. :(
I'm not sure what you mean went wrong.
But in an effort to try to wrap this up, can you please try -current
with just this diff and
On Saturday 25 June 2011, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
developer interest and active development.
Is softraid ready
On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-06-24 01.39, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
developer interest and active development.
Never used ccd(4) so can't
On 06/23/11 21:05, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
...
Maybe you can force nc(1) not to send a FIN segment by using something
like this:
cat infile - |nc host 1234
This works. Thanks!
On 06/24/11 18:46, Joel Sing wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote:
- More consistent sdn unit allocation (perhaps this is achievable
with DUID, I haven't had time to explore that yet)
sd(4) unit allocation will always be inconsistent and unpredicatable
- DUIDs will let you
* Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de [110624 21:24]:
On 06/24/11 18:46, Joel Sing wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote:
- More consistent sdn unit allocation (perhaps this is achievable
with DUID, I haven't had time to explore that yet)
sd(4) unit allocation will
On 06/24/11 19:40, Alexander Polakov wrote:
* Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de [110624 21:24]:
On 06/24/11 18:46, Joel Sing wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote:
- More consistent sdn unit allocation (perhaps this is achievable
with DUID, I haven't had time to explore
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 08:34:15PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
By the way, is there a way to mount umass(4) devices without looking at
dmesg for the number of the sdn device?
hotplugd(8)
That's not what I thought about, but even better - hotplugd the BSD way.
If you just need
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:16:05PM -0600, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
When a regular expression has zero-length matches in a string,
both sed(1) global replacement (/g) and replacement of numbered
instances (e.g. /2) are broken. This is not even limited to sed -E.
Both Otto's patch and my own
On 2011-06-24 18.46, Joel Sing wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-06-24 01.39, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
developer interest and active
22 matches
Mail list logo
