On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 05:55:27PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
I'll need testing on any and all architectures.
Is this in snapshots too?
* Luis Henriques hen...@camandro.org [111230 02:21]:
Hi,
I have been using for a while a hack to fix cwm windows cycle (the traditional
Alt-Tab). The problem is that I modified the default key binding but the
code actually expects Alt to be the modifier. The result is that, in some
On 2011/12/27 21:12, Matt Dainty wrote:
Attached are three patches for RFC 4638 PPPoE support. The first two are
for pppoe(4) based on similar changes made to NetBSD. The third patch is
to tcpdump(8) so it recognises the additional tag type.
..
I'm aware the patch as it currently stands
In du.c, fts_close() is missing before exit.
fts_close() may also return -1 on hitting an
error.
Index: usr.bin/du/du.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/du/du.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -p -r1.23 du.c
--- usr.bin/du/du.c
why?
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
In du.c, fts_close() is missing before exit.
fts_close() may also return -1 on hitting an
error.
Index: usr.bin/du/du.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/du/du.c,v
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:39:23 -0500 (EST)
From: logana...@devio.us (Loganaden Velvindron)
In du.c, fts_close() is missing before exit.
fts_close() may also return -1 on hitting an
error.
And what are you going to do if it does? Print an annoying error
message after everything the user
Hi,
Loganaden Velvindron wrote on Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:39:23AM -0500:
In du.c, fts_close() is missing before exit.
fts_close() may also return -1 on hitting an
error.
Looking at fts.c, fts_close(3) does three things:
1) lots of free(3)
2) close(2)
3) fchdir(2) back to the directory it
12:27 @brynet all fds will be closed and memory free'd when the process
terminates anyway
the diff is pointless...
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 06:09:39PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:39:23 -0500 (EST)
From: logana...@devio.us (Loganaden Velvindron)
Hi,
Loganaden Velvindron wrote on Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:30:44PM -0500:
the diff is pointless...
Well, not quite; looking at it, i found a few issues with the
fts(3) manual:
* Use the standard sentence regarding the return value;
it applies to this case.
* The return value of close(2)
These patches are submitted for your amusement.
My AMD64 system runs to the extent that it compiled
the kernel and ran fsck. DMA is allowed to pages over
0x. I/O to raw disk devices uses much less system time.
There are five pieces:
fix bounded allocation in uvm_pmemrange
enable
10 matches
Mail list logo
