On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:15:21PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014, at 06:50 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
You should realize that the pkg tools have gone thru *major internal
changes*
over the last month or so.
If you see weird things happening, now is a really good time to
I generally associate negative connotations with so-called, as in
the so-called free world. I wouldn't use it just to name something,
as in the kernel is written in the so-called C language. so-called
implies it's called this, but it's not.
Two imo dubious occurrences in the install notes. It's
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:08:29PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
I generally associate negative connotations with so-called, as in
the so-called free world. I wouldn't use it just to name something,
as in the kernel is written in the so-called C language. so-called
implies it's called this, but
On 31/12/13 5:50 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 31 December 2013 09:46, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 31/12/13 3:14 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 01:28:04 -0500
From: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com
Don't count RX overruns and missed packets as inputs errors. They're
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:53, Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:08:29PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
I generally associate negative connotations with so-called, as in
the so-called free world. I wouldn't use it just to name something,
as in the kernel is written in the so-called C
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
I agree with so-called having negative connotations.
I think both those instances are using it intentionally, namely there
are nasty surprises in some MBR blocks that are not covered by
the so-called MBR standard.
There's an actual MBR
